Guest George Mervosh Posted May 11, 2010 at 03:50 PM Report Share Posted May 11, 2010 at 03:50 PM By challenge, do you mean an appeal of his ruling?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kelsey Posted May 11, 2010 at 04:02 PM Report Share Posted May 11, 2010 at 04:02 PM Yes, in this instance it was a point of order that a motion was out of order due to a provision in the bylaws which the member making the point of order thought would result in the motion being out of order." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest George Mervosh Posted May 11, 2010 at 04:03 PM Report Share Posted May 11, 2010 at 04:03 PM The chair does not relinquish his position to deal with such an appeal." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rob Elsman Posted May 11, 2010 at 08:02 PM Report Share Posted May 11, 2010 at 08:02 PM I agree. And, if the Appeal is debatable, the chairman should speak in debate from the chair without relinquishing it, as George notes, to another." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kelsey Posted May 11, 2010 at 09:25 PM Report Share Posted May 11, 2010 at 09:25 PM Is there ever a situation where the a challenge of the chair should result in the chair relinquishing his role? Additionally, when an appeal is being heard, is it proper for other members besides the Chair and the member making the challenge to h" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rob Elsman Posted May 11, 2010 at 09:35 PM Report Share Posted May 11, 2010 at 09:35 PM I think it would be wise to drop the term "challenge the chair". When an Appeal is taken against the ruling of the chair, the maker is taking exception to the ruling, not the chair. The presiding officer who made the ruling should remain in the " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.