Guest George Bull Posted May 25, 2010 at 05:09 PM Report Share Posted May 25, 2010 at 05:09 PM We have a family owned company with four board members. One of the Board Members, my mother, is 96 years old and is very hard of hearing. I am her son and she asked my to vote for her on a motion during the Board Meeting. Is this permissable? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hmtcastle Posted May 25, 2010 at 05:11 PM Report Share Posted May 25, 2010 at 05:11 PM We have a family owned company with four board members. One of the Board Members, my mother, is 96 years old and is very hard of hearing. I am her son and she asked my to vote for her on a motion during the Board Meeting. Is this permissable?No. The right to vote is personal and not transferable.That's the RONR rule. You might check with an attorney to see if proxies are permitted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hmtcastle Posted May 25, 2010 at 05:14 PM Report Share Posted May 25, 2010 at 05:14 PM . . . though the board is free to permit you to attend and assist your mother. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trina Posted May 25, 2010 at 08:44 PM Report Share Posted May 25, 2010 at 08:44 PM We have a family owned company with four board members. One of the Board Members, my mother, is 96 years old and is very hard of hearing. I am her son and she asked my to vote for her on a motion during the Board Meeting. Is this permissable?I wonder if this might be approached as a question of personal privilege, since the member has trouble properly hearing the business of the assembly. This is not exactly the same as asking her son to 'cast her vote' (presumably based on his own decision process). However, if she were to request the presence of a helper, to keep her better informed during the meeting (for example, by passing her written notes of what is going on), would that qualify as a question of personal privilege (ruled upon by the chair... a ruling which could be appealed, however)?Or, is the presence of any additional human being, for whatever purpose, something that must be permitted by majority vote of the assembly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Honemann Posted May 25, 2010 at 09:15 PM Report Share Posted May 25, 2010 at 09:15 PM I wonder if this might be approached as a question of personal privilege, since the member has trouble properly hearing the business of the assembly. This is not exactly the same as asking her son to 'cast her vote' (presumably based on his own decision process). However, if she were to request the presence of a helper, to keep her better informed during the meeting (for example, by passing her written notes of what is going on), would that qualify as a question of personal privilege (ruled upon by the chair... a ruling which could be appealed, however)?Or, is the presence of any additional human being, for whatever purpose, something that must be permitted by majority vote of the assembly?Trina, the answer to the question asked is "no". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trina Posted May 25, 2010 at 09:32 PM Report Share Posted May 25, 2010 at 09:32 PM Trina, the answer to the question asked is "no". OK, I apparently should 'start a new topic for my new question'... as the familiar saying goes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.