Guest Tax the Devil Posted August 4, 2010 at 05:57 PM Report Share Posted August 4, 2010 at 05:57 PM At the end of a general meeting, a member decides she wants to speak about a subject that has not be put on the agenda. She requests it be to "off the record". Is that allowed and if so, how is it handled? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hmtcastle Posted August 4, 2010 at 06:04 PM Report Share Posted August 4, 2010 at 06:04 PM At the end of a general meeting, a member decides she wants to speak about a subject that has not be put on the agenda. She requests it be to "off the record". Is that allowed and if so, how is it handled?Generally speaking, such comments are never on the record (or in the record) to begin with. But if the members are willing to let her make a speech (and they don't have to), the minutes would simply record, at most, that Jane Doe spoke for two hours on the subject of free refreshments at the annual meeting.If she really wants to speak off the record she should wait until the meeting is over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kim Goldsworthy Posted August 4, 2010 at 07:34 PM Report Share Posted August 4, 2010 at 07:34 PM She requests it be to "off the record". There is no such term as "off the record" in Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (tenth edition, 2000, publ. by DaCapo).Q. What do you think that phrase means? What happens when something is "off the record"?(E.g., debate, commentary, opinion, etc., are not to appear in the minutes, by rule. So there would be no difference between "on the record" vs. "off the record" if the issue was "Shall this commentary be included in the minutes?" So that cannot be what is meant, surely.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest tax the devil Posted August 4, 2010 at 08:44 PM Report Share Posted August 4, 2010 at 08:44 PM Generally speaking, such comments are never on the record (or in the record) to begin with. But if the members are willing to let her make a speech (and they don't have to), the minutes would simply record, at most, that Jane Doe spoke for two hours on the subject of free refreshments at the annual meeting.If she really wants to speak off the record she should wait until the meeting is over.Thx. Your information is very useful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest tax the devil Posted August 4, 2010 at 08:58 PM Report Share Posted August 4, 2010 at 08:58 PM There is no such term as "off the record" in Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (tenth edition, 2000, publ. by DaCapo).Q. What do you think that phrase means? What happens when something is "off the record"?(E.g., debate, commentary, opinion, etc., are not to appear in the minutes, by rule. So there would be no difference between "on the record" vs. "off the record" if the issue was "Shall this commentary be included in the minutes?" So that cannot be what is meant, surely.)To answer your question, she did not want any of her commentary to be recorded. Neither she or her commentary were on the agenda and she refused to stop talking, basically taking over the meeting. The members were shocked. With a great deal of effort, the President was finally able to gain control. I believe if the minutes state the "So & So" spoke for 20 minutes about "this topic", that should cover it.Thank you for your input. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Martin Posted August 4, 2010 at 09:10 PM Report Share Posted August 4, 2010 at 09:10 PM To answer your question, she did not want any of her commentary to be recorded. Neither she or her commentary were on the agenda and she refused to stop talking, basically taking over the meeting. The members were shocked. With a great deal of effort, the President was finally able to gain control. I believe if the minutes state the "So & So" spoke for 20 minutes about "this topic", that should cover it.Her commentary wouldn't be recorded anyway, and whether she was on the agenda is irrelevant. Permission to speak when no motion is pending requires a majority vote or unanimous consent. (RONR, 10th ed., pg. 281, lines 18-20; pg. 287, lines 27-32) Since it seems the member did not receive such permission, I see no need for the minutes to mention her outburst at all. If this happens again, the chair should simply call the member to order when it is clear no motion is forthcoming. (RONR, 10th ed., pg. 32, line 34 - pg. 33, line 27) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest tax the devil Posted August 5, 2010 at 12:55 AM Report Share Posted August 5, 2010 at 12:55 AM Her commentary wouldn't be recorded anyway, and whether she was on the agenda is irrelevant. Permission to speak when no motion is pending requires a majority vote or unanimous consent. (RONR, 10th ed., pg. 281, lines 18-20; pg. 287, lines 27-32) Since it seems the member did not receive such permission, I see no need for the minutes to mention her outburst at all. If this happens again, the chair should simply call the member to order when it is clear no motion is forthcoming. (RONR, 10th ed., pg. 32, line 34 - pg. 33, line 27)Very helpful. Thank you very much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.