Guest Pete Posted September 23, 2010 at 04:32 PM Report Share Posted September 23, 2010 at 04:32 PM As we prepare for our annual elections, there are concerns amongst some of the members that candidates for two separate offices may not be in good standing. One has been the subject of a disciplinary hearing with an outcome of probation. The other is in the fact finding stages of the disciplinary process which will likely result in a similar outcome.Is there anything in Roberts Rules that excludes a candidate from running for office while on probation? There is nothing in our bylaws that defines "in good standing" or the consequences of not being in. Our bylaws state that anything not specifically defined will default to Roberts Rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hmtcastle Posted September 23, 2010 at 04:50 PM Report Share Posted September 23, 2010 at 04:50 PM Is there anything in Roberts Rules that excludes a candidate from running for office while on probation? There is nothing in our bylaws that defines "in good standing" or the consequences of not being in. Our bylaws state that anything not specifically defined will default to Roberts Rules.Though not explicitly defined in RONR, the consensus here is that a member in good standing is one who is free to exercise all the rights of membership. Whether that's what your bylaws mean by the term is something for your organization to determine. Presumably you (not you personally) knew what it meant when you put it in your bylaws (assuming it's in your bylaws). The same goes for "probation". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.