Guest Boardmember1 Posted August 18, 2011 at 01:49 PM Report Share Posted August 18, 2011 at 01:49 PM Two years ago the Board could not reach a quorum for election. The only two candidates were members of the Board and 5 seats were available. After two election meetings and the associated costs, the management company stated that your 3 year terms must be reappointed otherwise there would be no one on the board. The incumbents filled two and three remained empty. The following year a new election occurred. It was discussed by management and legal as to our appointed seats and they stated you can't run and turn over an entire board so the remaining 3 seats were filled. Now some dissidents are questioning our appointed seats and the past two elections. What does Roberts Rules state about this situation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jstackpo Posted August 18, 2011 at 08:11 PM Report Share Posted August 18, 2011 at 08:11 PM Not much of anything. This seems to be a problem with your bylaws, or a legal question.In general, points of order about most irregularities must be raised immediately in the meeting where the irregularities happened. Afterwards (especially two years after) is too late. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.