Guest J Matthew Posted May 31, 2012 at 08:14 PM Report Share Posted May 31, 2012 at 08:14 PM If you are holding a meeting on back to back days, upon the conclusion of the first day meeting, do you close the meeting and start with a new callilng the meeting to order the next day or not? What is the proper procedure to finish one day and then continue the next? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. J. Posted May 31, 2012 at 09:25 PM Report Share Posted May 31, 2012 at 09:25 PM If you are holding a meeting on back to back days, upon the conclusion of the first day meeting, do you close the meeting and start with a new callilng the meeting to order the next day or not? What is the proper procedure to finish one day and then continue the next?If you have some mechanish that has scheduled the meeting for the next day, you may adjourn until the previously scheduled meeting. If there is no meeting scheduled, you may use the motion Fix the Time To Which To Adjourn to set that next meeting (p. 242 ff.). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David A Foulkes Posted May 31, 2012 at 10:16 PM Report Share Posted May 31, 2012 at 10:16 PM If you have some mechanish that has scheduled the meeting for the next day, you may adjourn until the previously scheduled meeting. If there is no meeting scheduled, you may use the motion Fix the Time To Which To Adjourn to set that next meeting (p. 242 ff.).What's that, Yiddish for Chairman? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. J. Posted May 31, 2012 at 11:24 PM Report Share Posted May 31, 2012 at 11:24 PM What's that, Yiddish for Chairman? No, it Yiddish for, "Spell check doesn't work on this site." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Edgar Posted May 31, 2012 at 11:42 PM Report Share Posted May 31, 2012 at 11:42 PM Parliamententary? You get paid by the syllable, huh?No, but my spell check won't work on this site.What's that, Yiddish for Chairman?No, it Yiddish for, "Spell check doesn't work on this site."Perhaps you're using the wrong browser. Or haven't activated your browser's spell-checking feature. I'm currently using Google Chrome and its spell-checking feature works just fine on this site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. J. Posted June 1, 2012 at 02:25 AM Report Share Posted June 1, 2012 at 02:25 AM Perhaps you're using the wrong browser. Or haven't activated your browser's spell-checking feature. I'm currently using Google Chrome and its spell-checking feature works just fine on this site.It works on other sites. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Edgar Posted June 1, 2012 at 02:38 AM Report Share Posted June 1, 2012 at 02:38 AM It works on other sites.Well, if the spelling of "parliamentary" is a stumbling block, I think I'd want to use a browser whose spell-checker works on this site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. J. Posted June 1, 2012 at 03:44 AM Report Share Posted June 1, 2012 at 03:44 AM Well, if the spelling of "parliamentary" is a stumbling block, I think I'd want to use a browser whose spell-checker works on this site.It does not work . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.