Guest Frank Johnson Posted July 24, 2012 at 04:06 PM Report Share Posted July 24, 2012 at 04:06 PM The chair of our meetings is also the head of the disciplinary committee for our group. The chair has included himself in discussion and voting during the disciplinary committee meeting and voted to discipline a member. If the member appeals the decision, does the chair have to step down due to their active participation in the committee decision including having a vote on record supporting this decision? Committee is made up of 8 people while main body that would hear appeal has over 120 people that vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Harrison Posted July 24, 2012 at 04:32 PM Report Share Posted July 24, 2012 at 04:32 PM If the Chair believes that he can remain impartial when the Appeal is pending then there is no obligation under RONR for him to relinquish the chair. On the other hand if he believes that he cannot remain impartial then he should turn over the chair to the Vice Chair while the Appeal is pending. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Wynn Posted July 25, 2012 at 05:47 PM Report Share Posted July 25, 2012 at 05:47 PM The chair of our meetings is also the head of the disciplinary committee for our group. The chair has included himself in discussion and voting during the disciplinary committee meeting and voted to discipline a member. If the member appeals the decision, does the chair have to step down due to their active participation in the committee decision including having a vote on record supporting this decision? Committee is made up of 8 people while main body that would hear appeal has over 120 people that vote.This appeal process is not found in RONR, so it must be a product of some higher rule specifically applicable to your organization. Therefore, those rules that govern should be carefully examined and must be followed. It should also be noted that this is not an "Appeal" as RONR uses the term. As Chris H. has indicated, RONR does not prohibit an individual from presiding based on his vote regarding an earlier question, but it does require the chair to maintain a position of impartiality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.