Jump to content
The Official RONR Q & A Forums

Chris Harrison

Members
  • Content Count

    5,761
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Chris Harrison

  • Rank
    All felinophiles say "Aye"
  • Birthday 04/22/1977

Profile Information

  • Location:
    Winchester VA

Recent Profile Visitors

1,658 profile views
  1. The details you gave us are a bit unclear. Is a unanimous vote by the Council required to present the candidate to the congregation? Or is the default position that the Council presents the candidate to the congregation UNLESS they decided by a unanimous vote not to do so? Also, do the Bylaws allow the congregation to hire someone without it necessarily having to go through the Council?
  2. If there are more votes than voters than something seems to be amiss there. A re-vote would seem to be in order.
  3. I believe the OP was referring to the hearing in the Senate where they were grilling the Postmaster General and one of the Senators wouldn't let him finish an answer before "reclaiming her time."
  4. No. Unless there has been a rule adopted on the subject no one has a right to see let alone alter the minutes until they are up for approval at the next meeting. The next time the Branch Manager decides to insist to see the draft minutes the Secretary should insist in return she point out some adopted rule granting her the authority to do so. If she can't then the Secretary should politely decline the request.
  5. Depending on how large of an assembly we are talking about the Chair may have a duty to remain impartial at all times and if he wishes to express an opinion he should turn the chair to the Vice Chair. In any case it isn't proper for anyone to interrupt a speaker unless there is a legitimate reason to do so (such as raising a Point of Order, asking the Chair a question that cannot wait until the speaker is finished, asking if the speaker is willing to yield for a question, the Chair ruling something the speaker said is out of order because it violates decorum, etc). Commenting that "we need to start having the newsletter approved by a board member" doesn't appear to be a legitimate reason to interrupt the speaker.
  6. A vote in progress can't be interrupted with a few exceptions (RONR pp. 408-409). Of course, the Board member is free to vote against the motion.
  7. Yes (with a possible exception). RONR has a whole section dedicated to the Appeal. See RONR pp. 255-260. Be aware that only members of the body that is meeting (not members of the public) are allowed to Appeal a ruling.
  8. Since the $2500 had already been spent wouldn't the motion be fully executed and thus couldn't be amended?
  9. None that I see. That being said you should look at your City's laws to determine whether the Commission had the authority to do what they did.
  10. This being a RONR forum we try to stay away from some of those questions. That being said members can't be deprived of their right to attend meetings or vote except through disciplinary proceedings (RONR p. 3 ll. 1-9). So unless the Bylaws address this sort of situation I would argue that any attempt to exclude members or disenfranchise them is not only invalid but should lead to disciplinary actions against the President and anyone else who were exceeding their authority. Of course, if a member is feeling ill they owe it to themselves and everyone else to stay home!
  11. See these Official Interpretations. Also see this thread.
  12. The same thing happened to me. Glitch in the system that somehow showed up in the forum??
  13. I can't speak to whether the forum can be modified to do what you are asking. However, two ideas come to mind. 1) Create a document listing the title names and link to the URLs of the threads you want to be able to reference later. Or, 2) Depending on the browser you use (I use Firefox) you can probably create a folder for forum topics you want to be able to reference later and "bookmark" (or "favorite") whatever you are interested in.
  14. Yes. For one thing you won't have to deal with that pesky CAPTCHA test every time you want to post something. Also, you can edit your posts where a guest can't (I'm not sure if the recent issues with regular posters being able to edit has been resolved). One other plus, though it is more for the other posters than it is for you, is if you plan to contribute regularly having an account allows others to see your post count. If I were new to the forum with little knowledge about parliamentary procedure (and the resumes of people who contribute here) I would probably lend more credence to the reply of someone who has posted here hundreds or thousands of times over someone who is posting as a guest.
×
×
  • Create New...