Guest Vee Posted April 11, 2014 at 03:53 AM Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 at 03:53 AM A task force was listed on the meeting agenda to report findings, as charged at the previous meeting. The spokesman began to report actions and progress, but before making a recommendation or summary, he was interrupted by a committee member who demanded that any committee discussion on any topic must always follow a motion. He insisted that the spokesman should have stated the conclusions of the task force's work in the form of a motion prior to any discussion. The motion typically must first come before discussion, but in the case of requesting a report of findings, does that prevail? Thanks for the help! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sean Hunt Posted April 11, 2014 at 06:08 AM Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 at 06:08 AM A task force was listed on the meeting agenda to report findings, as charged at the previous meeting. The spokesman began to report actions and progress, but before making a recommendation or summary, he was interrupted by a committee member who demanded that any committee discussion on any topic must always follow a motion. He insisted that the spokesman should have stated the conclusions of the task force's work in the form of a motion prior to any discussion. The motion typically must first come before discussion, but in the case of requesting a report of findings, does that prevail? Thanks for the help! The proper procedure is for the chair to read the committee's report. If the chair is deviating from what was agreed upon by the committee, then he is proceeding incorrectly. If the explanation was in the report, however, then the chair should deliver it before making the motion. It's also worth noting that it is not, strictly speaking, in order during debate to discuss what happened in committee meetings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Novosielski Posted April 11, 2014 at 01:16 PM Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 at 01:16 PM A task force was listed on the meeting agenda to report findings, as charged at the previous meeting. The spokesman began to report actions and progress, but before making a recommendation or summary, he was interrupted by a committee member who demanded that any committee discussion on any topic must always follow a motion. He insisted that the spokesman should have stated the conclusions of the task force's work in the form of a motion prior to any discussion. The motion typically must first come before discussion, but in the case of requesting a report of findings, does that prevail? Thanks for the help! Yes a motion comes before debate, but the presenting of a committee report is not debate. The report should be given as drafted by the committee, and if the report contains any recommended actions, they should be moved at the end of the report. Those motions can be debated by the assembly, amended, ignored, adopted, as it pleases. If the reporting member was saying things that the committee (task force) did not approve, then he was acting improperly. But the member who interrupted him during his report was surely acting improperly, and what's worse, was interrupting with incorrect information. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Honemann Posted April 11, 2014 at 02:01 PM Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 at 02:01 PM The report should be given as drafted by the committee, and if the report contains any recommended actions, they should be moved at the end of the report. Those motions can be debated by the assembly, amended, ignored, adopted, as it pleases. Ignored? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sean Hunt Posted April 11, 2014 at 04:39 PM Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 at 04:39 PM At the very least, their consideration could be objected to, if they are original. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Novosielski Posted April 11, 2014 at 06:24 PM Report Share Posted April 11, 2014 at 06:24 PM Ignored? Heh. I guess it sounded less harsh than "Rejected". Maybe in the next edition? A motion "To Ignore With(out) Prejudice, the Recommendation of the Bloviation Committee". Besides, there are any number of ways to make a motion go away, and even make it look like an accident. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nancy N. Posted April 14, 2014 at 05:20 PM Report Share Posted April 14, 2014 at 05:20 PM Heh. I guess it sounded less harsh than "Rejected". Maybe in the next edition? A motion "To Ignore With(out) Prejudice, the Recommendation of the Bloviation Committee". Besides, there are any number of ways to make a motion go away, and even make it look like an accident. A few days ago, an OP described the disposition of a motion as rejected "-by unanimous groan-". It's not in RONR, but it gotta be somewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.