Tom Coronite Posted November 3, 2017 at 04:32 PM Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 at 04:32 PM P. 89 discusses what is required if "written notice" of a regular/stated meeting is to be sent. Here, the term "call" is not used. P. 91-93 discusses the notice of a special/called meeting and refers to the notice of such a meeting as a "call." Am I correct in concluding, then, that the term "call" is properly used only for special/called meetings? If written notice of a regular meeting is required by our bylaws, is it improper to refer to such a notice as a "call" because of the nature of the meeting? (I find it ridiculous that such a question is important in our proceedings, but it is what it is. :-D ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Honemann Posted November 3, 2017 at 04:37 PM Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 at 04:37 PM 3 minutes ago, Tom Coronite said: P. 89 discusses what is required if "written notice" of a regular/stated meeting is to be sent. Here, the term "call" is not used. P. 91-93 discusses the notice of a special/called meeting and refers to the notice of such a meeting as a "call." Am I correct in concluding, then, that the term "call" is properly used only for special/called meetings? If written notice of a regular meeting is required by our bylaws, is it improper to refer to such a notice as a "call" because of the nature of the meeting? (I find it ridiculous that such a question is important in our proceedings, but it is what it is. :-D ) The terms are synonymous. See page 4, lines 18-29. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Coronite Posted November 3, 2017 at 11:36 PM Author Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 at 11:36 PM Great. Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts