Guest Question Posted April 30, 2018 at 01:13 PM Report Share Posted April 30, 2018 at 01:13 PM In the context of the unanimous voting — does the term unanimous mean the entire board/committee or just those board/committee members in attendance? If a board/committee member is not in attendance -- must their vote be obtained in order to consider it unanimous? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. J. Posted April 30, 2018 at 01:27 PM Report Share Posted April 30, 2018 at 01:27 PM A unanimous vote simply means that there is no opposition voiced on the motion, e.g. unanimous consent. A vote of on in favor, none against and 5,000 abstentions is a unanimous vote. Except for unanimous consent, RONR does not really discuss or require unanimous votes. You bylaws may define them, if they require them for something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Brown Posted April 30, 2018 at 01:45 PM Report Share Posted April 30, 2018 at 01:45 PM 11 minutes ago, J. J. said: A vote of on in favor, none against and 5,000 abstentions is a unanimous vote. I think JJ meant to say "A vote of ONE in favor, none against. . . ". A vote of 1 to 0 with 5,000 abstentions can be referred to as a unanimous vote. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Brown Posted April 30, 2018 at 03:35 PM Report Share Posted April 30, 2018 at 03:35 PM 2 hours ago, Guest Question said: In the context of the unanimous voting — does the term unanimous mean the entire board/committee or just those board/committee members in attendance? If a board/committee member is not in attendance -- must their vote be obtained in order to consider it unanimous? To elaborate on my post immediately above, an abstention is not a vote. So, by definition, a unanimous vote means that, of those who voted, all were in favor. A vote is unanimous if no one voted in opposition unless some controlling rule provides otherwise. For example, it is my understanding that the United Nations Security Council has a rule in place which imposes a different requirement for some votes to be considered "unanimous". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. J. Posted April 30, 2018 at 07:09 PM Report Share Posted April 30, 2018 at 07:09 PM 5 hours ago, Richard Brown said: I think JJ meant to say "A vote of ONE in favor, none against. . . ". A vote of 1 to 0 with 5,000 abstentions can be referred to as a unanimous vote. Yes, I didn't hit the "e" hard enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts