Jump to content
The Official RONR Q & A Forums

Assembly and the Parliamentarian


J. J.
 Share

Recommended Posts

"The parliamentarian can and perhaps should affirm that motions which violate the bylaws are not in order, but I agree with D.H. that judging whether a particular motion does or does not conflict is beyond the scope of a non-member parliamentarian's duties. "

However, the Parliamentarian would be within the scope of duties to explain, if necessary or helpful, RONR's rules of interpretation.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, smb said:

"The parliamentarian can and perhaps should affirm that motions which violate the bylaws are not in order, but I agree with D.H. that judging whether a particular motion does or does not conflict is beyond the scope of a non-member parliamentarian's duties. "

However, the Parliamentarian would be within the scope of duties to explain, if necessary or helpful, RONR's rules of interpretation.  

RONR has no rules of interpretation. Some principles of interpretation are set forth on pages 588-91, but these are not rules, and certainly not rules of parliamentary procedure.

But having said that, I agree that it probably would not be remiss for the parliamentarian, if asked, to inform the assembly concerning these principles where applicable.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...