Guest Mum Posted September 5, 2019 at 03:53 PM Report Share Posted September 5, 2019 at 03:53 PM In an HOA situation where the membership is in authority over the board, Can a trial be initiated through the membership, bypassing the board, if the whole of the board has been corrupted against RONR? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Harrison Posted September 5, 2019 at 03:56 PM Report Share Posted September 5, 2019 at 03:56 PM What do the Bylaws say regarding discipline? Who do they say can implement disciplinary proceedings? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mum Posted September 5, 2019 at 04:22 PM Report Share Posted September 5, 2019 at 04:22 PM 25 minutes ago, Chris Harrison said: What do the Bylaws say regarding discipline? Who do they say can implement disciplinary proceedings? They do not say anything about discipline, besides how to remove a single board member, or the entire board. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Zev Posted September 5, 2019 at 06:47 PM Report Share Posted September 5, 2019 at 06:47 PM Please quote the bylaws concerning the term of office for board members. The exact language, if you please. This is important because that language will determine if a formal trial will be required or whether simply electing new board members would be sufficient. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Martin Posted September 6, 2019 at 02:09 AM Report Share Posted September 6, 2019 at 02:09 AM 9 hours ago, Guest Mum said: They do not say anything about discipline, besides how to remove a single board member, or the entire board. Then follow those procedures. 7 hours ago, Guest Zev said: Please quote the bylaws concerning the term of office for board members. The exact language, if you please. This is important because that language will determine if a formal trial will be required or whether simply electing new board members would be sufficient. I don’t know if the term of office is relevant since we are told that the bylaws say “how to remove a single board member, or the entire board.” It seems to me the rules in the bylaws take precedence. “Of course, if the bylaws themselves establish a procedure for removal from office, that procedure must be followed.” (FAQ #20) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Zev Posted September 6, 2019 at 03:26 AM Report Share Posted September 6, 2019 at 03:26 AM 1 hour ago, Josh Martin said: I don’t know if the term of office is relevant since we are told that the bylaws say “how to remove a single board member, or the entire board.” Perhaps I misunderstood Guest Mum as saying that the bylaws did not contain any words related to discipline or any words about the removal of board members. Given this, I considered that the wording in the bylaws about the term of office would determine whether a formal trial would be needed or not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Martin Posted September 6, 2019 at 09:14 PM Report Share Posted September 6, 2019 at 09:14 PM (edited) 17 hours ago, Guest Zev said: Perhaps I misunderstood Guest Mum as saying that the bylaws did not contain any words related to discipline or any words about the removal of board members. Given this, I considered that the wording in the bylaws about the term of office would determine whether a formal trial would be needed or not. If this in fact correct, then I agree. I interpreted the OP’s post as meaning that there were no provisions regarding discipline other than rules concerning the removal of a board member (or of the entire board). Perhaps the OP can clarify. Edited September 6, 2019 at 09:14 PM by Josh Martin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts