Guest hsiegling Posted September 21, 2019 at 12:50 PM Report Share Posted September 21, 2019 at 12:50 PM When we take a look at the minutes to be approved at the beginning of our meetings, we make such occasional corrections related to punctuation, spelling of names, etc.. Our minutes will then typically reflect that the previous minutes were "approved as amended." In this case, must evidence of the particular corrections be noted? Thank you ahead of time for any insights! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Transpower Posted September 21, 2019 at 01:22 PM Report Share Posted September 21, 2019 at 01:22 PM RONR (11th ed.), p. 460, ll. 13-17: "Any member has a right to examine [the minutes] ...at a reasonable time and place, but this privilege must not be abused to the annoyance of the secretary." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Honemann Posted September 21, 2019 at 01:34 PM Report Share Posted September 21, 2019 at 01:34 PM 44 minutes ago, Guest hsiegling said: When we take a look at the minutes to be approved at the beginning of our meetings, we make such occasional corrections related to punctuation, spelling of names, etc.. Our minutes will then typically reflect that the previous minutes were "approved as amended." In this case, must evidence of the particular corrections be noted? Thank you ahead of time for any insights! "Any correction approved by the assembly is made in the text of the minutes being approved; the minutes of the meeting making the correction merely state that the minutes were approved 'as corrected,' without specifying what the correction was (see form, p. 472, ll. 8–9)." (RONR, 11th ed., p. 469) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts