Guest Trish@ironpigsmoke.com Posted May 12, 2021 at 05:12 PM Report Share Posted May 12, 2021 at 05:12 PM Good Afternoon, I am hoping someone can help answer a question I have. At a recent city council meeting ( in a small little town not to be named) it was discussed and passed that the city was waiving application fees for an ordinance that is not in existence yet. The Ordinance has been tabled but they already waived the fees.... ? Would that have been in violation of Roberts Rules of Order ? should we not first have said ordinance then discuss the waiving of fee's? Any words of wisdom will be appreciated on this matter. Thank you. Trish Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Martin Posted May 12, 2021 at 07:19 PM Report Share Posted May 12, 2021 at 07:19 PM 2 hours ago, Guest Trish@ironpigsmoke.com said: I am hoping someone can help answer a question I have. At a recent city council meeting ( in a small little town not to be named) it was discussed and passed that the city was waiving application fees for an ordinance that is not in existence yet. The Ordinance has been tabled but they already waived the fees.... ? Would that have been in violation of Roberts Rules of Order ? should we not first have said ordinance then discuss the waiving of fee's? While this is certainly a bit odd, I don't think it violates anything in Robert's Rules of Order. This has far more to do with the rules of the council, and possibly also procedural rules in applicable law. I imagine this unusual procedure was followed due to various previous notice requirements for the council's actions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Novosielski Posted May 16, 2021 at 03:54 AM Report Share Posted May 16, 2021 at 03:54 AM On 5/12/2021 at 1:12 PM, Guest Trish@ironpigsmoke.com said: Good Afternoon, I am hoping someone can help answer a question I have. At a recent city council meeting ( in a small little town not to be named) it was discussed and passed that the city was waiving application fees for an ordinance that is not in existence yet. The Ordinance has been tabled but they already waived the fees.... ? Would that have been in violation of Roberts Rules of Order ? should we not first have said ordinance then discuss the waiving of fee's? Any words of wisdom will be appreciated on this matter. It is a little weird, but I don't think it can cause much trouble in practice. Now if they had tried to collect fees for an ordinance that didn't exist, that's definitely a problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts