Guest L Robert Posted August 11, 2010 at 09:15 PM Report Share Posted August 11, 2010 at 09:15 PM When a 2/3 vote is needed to ammend a restriction, how are non-voting members counted?For example, if you have an association that has 100 possible votes and 75 votes are cast, what is the percentage needed to pass.Is it 2/3 of the total membership of 100 which would be 67?Or, is it 2/3 of the votes cast, in this case 75 votes cast 2/3 would equal 50?How is a super majority vote determined to be simple or absolute? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hmtcastle Posted August 11, 2010 at 09:20 PM Report Share Posted August 11, 2010 at 09:20 PM When a 2/3 vote is needed to ammend a restriction, how are non-voting members counted?They're not. See FAQ #6.It's two-thirds of the votes cast.How is a super majority vote determined to be simple or absolute?That question is unclear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest L Robert Posted August 11, 2010 at 10:34 PM Report Share Posted August 11, 2010 at 10:34 PM They're not. See FAQ #6.It's two-thirds of the votes cast.That question is unclear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest L Robert Posted August 11, 2010 at 10:42 PM Report Share Posted August 11, 2010 at 10:42 PM I have read that there are two kinds of super majority.One is "simple" which I understand would be 2/3 of votes cast.The other is "absolute" which I understand to be 2/3 of all eligible members.So, how does Roberts Rules of Order define a 2/3 super majority? Simple or absolute?Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hmtcastle Posted August 11, 2010 at 10:54 PM Report Share Posted August 11, 2010 at 10:54 PM I have read that there are two kinds of super majority.One is "simple" which I understand would be 2/3 of votes cast.The other is "absolute" which I understand to be 2/3 of all eligible members.So, how does Roberts Rules of Order define a 2/3 super majority? Simple or absolute?A two-thirds vote is defined as the affirmative vote at least two-thirds of those present and voting.With 99 members present, a vote of 1-0 would be a two-thirds vote.But your terminology is foreign to RONR and, frankly, me.A simple majority usually refers to more than half. A super majority is anything greater than that (e.g. two-thirds, three-fourths, etc.). So a majority is either simple or super. There's no simple super majority.And, again, these are not RONR terms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trina Posted August 12, 2010 at 11:55 AM Report Share Posted August 12, 2010 at 11:55 AM I have read that there are two kinds of super majority.One is "simple" which I understand would be 2/3 of votes cast.The other is "absolute" which I understand to be 2/3 of all eligible members.So, how does Roberts Rules of Order define a 2/3 super majority? Simple or absolute?ThanksUnder RONR, the default definition of a two-thirds vote is what you are describing as a 'simple super majority.'Some organizations probably use your 'absolute super majority' for certain types of votes, but that would have to be specified in the organization's governing rules (e.g. bylaws) -- it is not from Robert's Rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Ralph Posted August 12, 2010 at 01:00 PM Report Share Posted August 12, 2010 at 01:00 PM And not only specified, but explained too. Otherwise, who'll know what an extremely absolute super-duper majority is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.