Jump to content
The Official RONR Q & A Forums

notice of information?


Guest karen

Recommended Posts

can a "notice of information" be utilized to afford an opportunity to provide additional information at a future meeting for a motion made in a previous meeting?

I was looking for confirmation that there is no "notice of information" A board member is wanting to provide additional information to an issue that has already been decided and moved on at a previous meeting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was looking for confirmation that there is no "notice of information" A board member is wanting to provide additional information to an issue that has already been decided and moved on at a previous meeting.

Well, what the Board member can do if the motion was adopted and has not been fully executed is to move to Rescind/Amend Something Previously Adopted (RONR pp. 293-299) and in debate the added info can be presented. However, if the motion was adopted in a meeting of the General Membership the motion to R/ASPA can only be introduced in a General Membership meeting. If the motion was adopted in a Board meeting the motion to R/ASPA can be introduced in a Board meeting or a General Membership meeting (where the Board's action can be countermanded).

If the motion was defeated it can be renewed at any session (for most bodies a session is the same as a meeting).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A board member is wanting to provide additional information to an issue that has already been decided and moved on at a previous meeting.

Unless he intends to conclude his remarks with a motion to Rescind or to Amend Something Previously Adopted (or to renew the motion, if it was defeated), this is not in order. See RONR, 10th ed., pg. 379, lines 31-36; pg. 381, lines 1-6.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless he intends to conclude his remarks with a motion to Rescind or to Amend Something Previously Adopted (or to renew the motion, if it was defeated), this is not in order. See RONR, 10th ed., pg. 379, lines 31-36; pg. 381, lines 1-6.

Shouldn't he lead off with that, and then launch into his remarks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...