Guest leo Posted August 7, 2011 at 09:29 PM Report Share Posted August 7, 2011 at 09:29 PM A main motion was given 3 pro and 3 con discussions. Then an amendment was moved but parliamentarian ruled that no amendment could take place after 3 pro and 3 con discussions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David A Foulkes Posted August 7, 2011 at 09:33 PM Report Share Posted August 7, 2011 at 09:33 PM A main motion was given 3 pro and 3 con discussions. Then an amendment was moved but parliamentarian ruled that no amendment could take place after 3 pro and 3 con discussions?No such requirement for 3 pro/con discussions, nor such restriction against amending, will be found in RONR. You might ask your parliamentarian where that idea came from. And it's not the parliamentarian's place to make rulings. That right belongs to the presiding officer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Mervosh Posted August 8, 2011 at 12:26 AM Report Share Posted August 8, 2011 at 12:26 AM A main motion was given 3 pro and 3 con discussions. Explain that in detail if you don't mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.