Jump to content
The Official RONR Q & A Forums

Board of Directors meeting agenda


Guest Julia Larson

Recommended Posts

Once items have been agendized, agenda sent to board members, and meeting is

held. Is it correct that items cannot be added to agenda but they can be dropped?

This is a meeting of the board consisting of president, vice president, secretary

and Treasurer.

Another question:

Our organization held an election for officers. The person who lost the election for vice

president brought up the matter that the person who won the election was not

eligible. It was the wording in the membership job description. Others, outside our

chapter, have gotten involved and say the person who lost should be allowed to

hold the office. She lost the election because no one wanted her in the position.

What say you?

Thank you so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once items have been agendized, agenda sent to board members, and meeting is

held. Is it correct that items cannot be added to agenda but they can be dropped?

This is a meeting of the board consisting of president, vice president, secretary

and Treasurer.

A proposed agenda does not become the official agenda for the session until it is adopted by the assembly. During its consideration, the agenda can be amended by a majority vote. After adoption, the agenda can be amended by a two-thirds vote.

In any event, the adoption of an agenda does not prevent business from being introduced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once items have been agendized, agenda sent to board members, and meeting is

held. Is it correct that items cannot be added to agenda but they can be dropped?

This is a meeting of the board consisting of president, vice president, secretary

and Treasurer.

The Agenda is not official until is approved by the assembly. Thus items can be added or dropped prior to the Agenda becoming official. Also, items can be brought up under "New Business" and there are options to "drop" issues quickly - for example to postpone indefinitely (or postpone definitely.)

Our organization held an election for officers. The person who lost the election for vice

president brought up the matter that the person who won the election was not

eligible. It was the wording in the membership job description. Others, outside our

chapter, have gotten involved and say the person who lost should be allowed to

hold the office. She lost the election because no one wanted her in the position.

What say you?

Sounds like sour grapes to me. If the other person is ineligible then the person's nomination should not have been accepted. However if no one wants the person who lost to be on the Board then that is more important and then it certainly sounds like sour grapes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like sour grapes to me. If the other person is ineligible then the person's nomination should not have been accepted. However if no one wants the person who lost to be on the Board then that is more important and then it certainly sounds like sour grapes.

Sour grapes or not, if an ineligible person has been elected, there may be reason to re-do the election. Several recent threads in the Advanced Forum have been delving into this topic, and the continuing breach that may arise in such a case. There is likely much more to this, especially as regards qualifications of officers, venturing into the bylaws. I'd not be too quick to dismiss this with a bad year off the vine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our organization held an election for officers. The person who lost the election for vice

president brought up the matter that the person who won the election was not

eligible. It was the wording in the membership job description. Others, outside our

chapter, have gotten involved and say the person who lost should be allowed to

hold the office. She lost the election because no one wanted her in the position.

What say you?

I say that if she came in second she could not possibly have gotten a majority of the votes cast, and therefore is not elected. If the election was improper, then a new election will be required.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another question:

Our organization held an election for officers. The person who lost the election for vice

president brought up the matter that the person who won the election was not

eligible. It was the wording in the membership job description. Others, outside our

chapter, have gotten involved and say the person who lost should be allowed to

hold the office. She lost the election because no one wanted her in the position.

What say you?

Thank you so much.

You can't win an election by losing it. ;)

For a candidate to be elected, he must receive a majority of the votes cast for that office.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...