Guest David Godley Posted February 21, 2012 at 02:31 AM Report Share Posted February 21, 2012 at 02:31 AM We have a statewide organization governed by an elected district governor and nine Lt. governors. I can't find anything prohibiting a Lt Governor serving two different zones within statewide organization. Our bylaws do refer to the duties of the Lt. governor as singular zone representation. "Each Lieutenant Governor shall function as the prime representative of ***** International and the District within his/her assigned zone. It is the duty of the Lieutenant to help the clubs within his/her zone to meeting the mission and purposes of ***** International, and to help them grow in membership and in service."Is there any information that can help me advise our organization about whether one person can serve as a Lt Governor for two zones? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Wynn Posted February 21, 2012 at 02:49 AM Report Share Posted February 21, 2012 at 02:49 AM RONR doesn't prohibit it. You'll have to check your bylaws thoroughly to see if such a prohibition exists there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dave Godley Posted September 13, 2012 at 02:40 AM Report Share Posted September 13, 2012 at 02:40 AM WOW I am totally impressed. My question was answered by the President of Perfect Rules. Thank you sir for taking the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David A Foulkes Posted September 13, 2012 at 10:51 AM Report Share Posted September 13, 2012 at 10:51 AM WOW I am totally impressed. My question was answered by the President of Perfect Rules. Thank you sir for taking the time.Oh great. This is all Wynn needs to see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Wynn Posted September 13, 2012 at 11:30 AM Report Share Posted September 13, 2012 at 11:30 AM Oh great. This is all Wynn needs to see. Wynn saw it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Wynn Posted September 13, 2012 at 11:31 AM Report Share Posted September 13, 2012 at 11:31 AM WOW I am totally impressed. My question was answered by the President of Perfect Rules. Thank you sir for taking the time.You're welcome, sir. Come back, anytime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sMargaret Posted September 13, 2012 at 02:20 PM Report Share Posted September 13, 2012 at 02:20 PM David Godley, one thing to keep in mind is that unless your bylaws specifically give the right to vote at board meetings to each position, by default RONR goes by one person, one vote. A little wrinkle your organization may wish to consider. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest David Godley Posted December 21, 2012 at 11:51 PM Report Share Posted December 21, 2012 at 11:51 PM Thanks everyone. One person one vote. Good point. Just one more question. Is Mr. Foulkes the next president wantabee? Just a joke nothing personal. I need to get a picture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nancy N. Posted December 22, 2012 at 11:33 AM Report Share Posted December 22, 2012 at 11:33 AM With reference to the possibility of David Foulkes serving as the president of Perfect Rules. I"m reminded of the conversational exchange from "The Avengers" -- not the current smash-blockbuster movie super-hero group, but an awesome British TV programme (I'm such a suckup) that was shown for about three years, at least here in the US, around 1967 - 1969, about a couple of spies or agents or whatever, who fought crime; they were John Steed, who got paid (a government employee -- civil service, probably free dental, don't get me started), played by Patrick Macnee, and Emma Peel, a "talented amateur," played by the supernal Diana Rigg. In the course of whatever investigation was going on, a character bristled and said heatedly to Mrs Peel, "You must think me a perfect fool!"To which she coolly replied, "No-one's perfect."capcha try 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Edgar Posted December 22, 2012 at 02:13 PM Report Share Posted December 22, 2012 at 02:13 PM To which she coolly replied, "No-one's perfect."I very much doubt that Mrs. Peel inserted a hyphen where it didn't belong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shmuel Gerber Posted December 22, 2012 at 11:56 PM Report Share Posted December 22, 2012 at 11:56 PM To which she coolly replied, "No-one's perfect."I very much doubt that Mrs. Peel inserted a hyphen where it didn't belong.Oh, the British do love their hy-phens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Edgar Posted December 23, 2012 at 12:17 AM Report Share Posted December 23, 2012 at 12:17 AM Oh, the British do love their hy-phens.Hmm. According to Wiktionary, "American users (COCA) prefer the spelling no one to either noone or no-one by more than 500 to 1 and UK users (BNC) prefer no-one to noone 50 to 1 and no one to noone 12 to 1.That's news to me and I stand corrected.(And I like hyphens also, as in, say, mis-spelled which, apparently, neither the US nor the UK prefers.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sean Hunt Posted December 23, 2012 at 12:29 AM Report Share Posted December 23, 2012 at 12:29 AM Be careful about old westerns, where you will find noone wandering around at highe noone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David A Foulkes Posted December 23, 2012 at 12:31 AM Report Share Posted December 23, 2012 at 12:31 AM Hmm. According to Wiktionary, "American users (COCA) prefer the spelling no one to either noone or no-one by more than 500 to 1 and UK users (BNC) prefer no-one to noone 50 to 1 and no one to noone 12 to 1.That's news to me and I stand corrected.(And I like hyphens also, as in, say, mis-spelled which, apparently, neither the US nor the UK prefers.)I sent this in an email to a British friend of mine. He sent me an e-mail back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.