Guest GB Posted March 21, 2012 at 06:25 PM Report Share Posted March 21, 2012 at 06:25 PM I realize there have been several similar discussions but none have been directly applicable to my particular situation.My organization is a member of a larger organization. There is a motion on the agenda to be voted on at the next meeting but our club (and at least one other) do not feel that content of this motion (a change to club catchment areas) was arrived at through fair and inclusive means. i.e. there was to be a sub-committee struck to discuss a potential by-law change but this did not take place. Instead, two members of the Executive (one a non-voting, paid member) arbitrarily decided on the boundary changes without any consultation with any of the member clubs. We would like to call that this vote not take place on the grounds that the motion was not concieved fairly (or something to that effect) and that all member clubs should be consulted and have input prior to any motion on boundary changes being put forward.Can this be done? Is there proper terminology that should be used? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Mervosh Posted March 21, 2012 at 06:34 PM Report Share Posted March 21, 2012 at 06:34 PM You can either move to postpone it indefinitely (RONR, p. 126ff), which will kill it only for this session; or move to Commit (RONR, p. 168ff) if you'd like to send it to a committee for study - and your assembly can set up those committee details right then and there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.