Guest Grace Posted February 9, 2013 at 03:27 PM Report Share Posted February 9, 2013 at 03:27 PM Must the person be named who 2nd a motion in minutes to be approved? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Harrison Posted February 9, 2013 at 03:30 PM Report Share Posted February 9, 2013 at 03:30 PM The name of the seconder shouldn't be included in the minutes unless the assembly orders it (RONR p. 470 ll. 26-28). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest James Posted February 9, 2013 at 04:01 PM Report Share Posted February 9, 2013 at 04:01 PM What if it pertains to money? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Harrison Posted February 9, 2013 at 04:44 PM Report Share Posted February 9, 2013 at 04:44 PM What if it pertains to money?That wouldn't change my answer. A second is merely an indicator to the Chair that more than one member want to see the motion considered and even if there is no second it would be too late to object after the motion has started to be considered. So the fact that more than one person wants to see the motion considered really doesn't matter very much in the scheme of things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Edgar Posted February 9, 2013 at 07:30 PM Report Share Posted February 9, 2013 at 07:30 PM But what if it pertains to . . . aw, forget it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Novosielski Posted February 17, 2013 at 01:29 AM Report Share Posted February 17, 2013 at 01:29 AM What if it pertains to money?Oh. If it pertains to money, then the name of the seconder shouldn't be included in the minutes unless the assembly orders it (RONR p. 470 ll. 26-28). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.