Guest Robert Gifford Posted March 19, 2015 at 01:45 AM Report Share Posted March 19, 2015 at 01:45 AM We are a department in an academic setting.Most decisions are made pretty informally.We do, however, recognize Robert's Rules asthe authority when things become complex. In this case, with two retirements pending, the issue was"In which are of the field should we seek replacements?" The chair announced (but did not put to a vote) that"We will vote separates on each proposal. Any proposalthat receives more yes votes than no votes will beforwarded to the central administration." Three proposals were put forward (formally moved for acceptance)over a several week period. In the meeting, two were clearlypassed, and one received 12 yea and 12 nay votes. However,the Chair announced that all three would go forward andquickly closed the meeting without further business beingallowed (or requested). The next day, the Chair announced by email, "I made amistake and the third proposal will not go forward." I am the mover of this third proposal. Is there any hope within Robert's Rules? Thank you!Robert Gifford (answer here on the forum...I am new here... or directly to rgifford@uvic.ca Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hieu H. Huynh Posted March 19, 2015 at 02:23 AM Report Share Posted March 19, 2015 at 02:23 AM Guest_Robert Gifford, you could become a member of this forum. One of the benefits is that you could "follow" a topic so that each response to that topic could be sent to you by email. Then you wouldn't need to display your email address in a public forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hieu H. Huynh Posted March 19, 2015 at 02:45 AM Report Share Posted March 19, 2015 at 02:45 AM Generally there is a timeliness requirement for a point of order. RONR says: "Points of order regarding the conduct of a vote must be raised immediately following the announcement of the voting result (see pp. 408-9)." (RONR 11th ed., p. 250, l. 30 to p. 251, l. 2) Since there was no timely point of order, the three adopted motions are in effect unless they are rescinded or amended. I think Official Interpretation 2006-18 may also be of use. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Robert Gifford Posted March 19, 2015 at 04:46 AM Report Share Posted March 19, 2015 at 04:46 AM Sorry for the typos above; I was more than a bit annoyed at the time.Correct:"which area of the field"and"We will vote separately on each proposal"Robert Gifford Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.