Guest Larry Posted February 8, 2017 at 08:40 PM Report Share Posted February 8, 2017 at 08:40 PM If it takes to names to sign a check, can it bothers? Both are officers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jstackpo Posted February 8, 2017 at 08:50 PM Report Share Posted February 8, 2017 at 08:50 PM RONR has nothing to say about who (or how many people, or how related) can/should sign checks. It is up to the association (and perhaps the bank) to specify what it (or they) want to require. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Novosielski Posted February 9, 2017 at 01:02 AM Report Share Posted February 9, 2017 at 01:02 AM Nothing in RONR would prevent it from canning bothers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kim Goldsworthy Posted February 9, 2017 at 08:10 AM Report Share Posted February 9, 2017 at 08:10 AM 11 hours ago, Guest Larry said: If it takes to names to sign a check, can it bothers? Both are officers. Let me do a spell check on this sentence. >> IF IT TAKES [TWO] NAMES TO SIGN A CHECK, CAN IT [BE] [BROTHERS]? BOTH [BROTHERS] ARE OFFICERS. Q. Is that the question intended? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary c Tesser Posted February 9, 2017 at 01:26 PM Report Share Posted February 9, 2017 at 01:26 PM 5 hours ago, Kim Goldsworthy said: Let me do a spell check on this sentence. >> IF IT TAKES [TWO] NAMES TO SIGN A CHECK, CAN IT [BE] [BROTHERS]? BOTH [BROTHERS] ARE OFFICERS. Q. Is that the question intended? Kim, please put a sock on this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts