Vicki Clark Posted April 19, 2021 at 05:18 PM Report Posted April 19, 2021 at 05:18 PM One of our board members submitted their resignation during a meeting with the effective date to occur at the conclusion of the meeting. This was followed by a motion to elect a replacement and after the motion was seconded a vote was taken. The soon-to-be resigned member participated in the vote and a replacement was elected with a few members opposed. One of the opposing members is now objecting to the vote saying there was no vacant position to be filled at the exact time of the vote. Was the vote proper or should we consider it invalid? Quote
George Mervosh Posted April 19, 2021 at 05:36 PM Report Posted April 19, 2021 at 05:36 PM 8 minutes ago, Vicki Clark said: One of our board members submitted their resignation during a meeting with the effective date to occur at the conclusion of the meeting. This was followed by a motion to elect a replacement and after the motion was seconded a vote was taken. The soon-to-be resigned member participated in the vote and a replacement was elected with a few members opposed. One of the opposing members is now objecting to the vote saying there was no vacant position to be filled at the exact time of the vote. Was the vote proper or should we consider it invalid? Was this at a board meeting and, if so, were any board members absent from this meeting? Quote
Dan Honemann Posted April 19, 2021 at 05:43 PM Report Posted April 19, 2021 at 05:43 PM 22 minutes ago, Vicki Clark said: One of our board members submitted their resignation during a meeting with the effective date to occur at the conclusion of the meeting. This was followed by a motion to elect a replacement and after the motion was seconded a vote was taken. The soon-to-be resigned member participated in the vote and a replacement was elected with a few members opposed. One of the opposing members is now objecting to the vote saying there was no vacant position to be filled at the exact time of the vote. Was the vote proper or should we consider it invalid? 4 minutes ago, George Mervosh said: Was this at a board meeting and, if so, were any board members absent from this meeting? ... and do your bylaws classify board members as officers? 🙂 Quote
Vicki Clark Posted April 19, 2021 at 05:47 PM Author Report Posted April 19, 2021 at 05:47 PM This occurred during a regularly scheduled board meeting. Our organization has both officers and board members. Officers attend and are part of debate but do not vote on movements. All board members were present. Quote
George Mervosh Posted April 19, 2021 at 08:24 PM Report Posted April 19, 2021 at 08:24 PM 2 hours ago, Vicki Clark said: This occurred during a regularly scheduled board meeting. Our organization has both officers and board members. Officers attend and are part of debate but do not vote on movements. All board members were present. Given this information I don't see any violation of any rule in RONR. Quote
Vicki Clark Posted April 19, 2021 at 11:36 PM Author Report Posted April 19, 2021 at 11:36 PM Thank you. Quote
Guest ??? Posted April 20, 2021 at 12:10 AM Report Posted April 20, 2021 at 12:10 AM If the Board of Directors is 7 in the By-Laws, how can the position be filled until the position is vacant? Also not all details are provided here.....the resigning person nominated her mother and discussion was still ongoing when the motion was given. The board wanted to wait and seek a member because there are already 3 board members from one chapter.... The vote was split and the chair (one of the 3) voted in favor. The resigning board member should have abstained from voting due to the relationship. This happening is splitting the organization apart, common sense would say do what is best for the organization and fill the position at the next board meeting. Quote
Atul Kapur Posted April 20, 2021 at 12:20 AM Report Posted April 20, 2021 at 12:20 AM First, I agree with Mr. Mervosh. 5 minutes ago, Guest ??? said: The resigning board member should have abstained from voting due to the relationship. Nothing in RONR requires this. In fact, RONR says that a member cannot be required to abstain. 7 minutes ago, Guest ??? said: The board wanted to wait Apparently the majority did not want to wait, otherwise they would have voted against the motion or continued debate on the motion. Quote
Guest ??? Posted April 20, 2021 at 01:33 AM Report Posted April 20, 2021 at 01:33 AM Unfortunately this is a control issue for the organization and several members have resigned or quit the organization altogether..... sad because this organization has a wonderful mission but controlling leadership that is suffocating the growth and continued success of the organization. Quote
Dan Honemann Posted April 20, 2021 at 10:18 AM Report Posted April 20, 2021 at 10:18 AM 8 hours ago, Guest ??? said: Unfortunately this is a control issue for the organization and several members have resigned or quit the organization altogether..... sad because this organization has a wonderful mission but controlling leadership that is suffocating the growth and continued success of the organization. None of this is relevant to the question as to whether or not any rule has been violated, but in any event, this forum is not the place to dispute the facts involved in any actual happening or event. If you wish to pose a question concerning the proper application of the rules in RONR to your own set of facts, you are welcome to do so by starting a new topic of your your own. Quote
Recommended Posts