J. J. Posted February 3, 2022 at 07:45 PM Report Share Posted February 3, 2022 at 07:45 PM On 2/3/2022 at 8:59 AM, Josh Martin said: I am in agreement that the example you provide would be a circumstance in which the rule of 45:5 is applicable. Further, as I have previously indicated, I believe that disciplinary motions are divisible upon demand of a single member, which would seem to resolve the problems as applied to discipline. I still do not agree that the rule of 45:4 becomes inapplicable anytime an interest is shared in common with at least one other member. What about censure, the motion, not the disciplinary penalty. You would have the same situation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Martin Posted February 3, 2022 at 09:47 PM Report Share Posted February 3, 2022 at 09:47 PM On 2/3/2022 at 1:45 PM, J. J. said: What about censure, the motion, not the disciplinary penalty. You would have the same situation. If the example you provided had involved a non-disciplinary motion to censure instead, I would still be in agreement that the rule on 45:5 would be applicable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. J. Posted February 4, 2022 at 03:41 PM Report Share Posted February 4, 2022 at 03:41 PM On 2/3/2022 at 4:47 PM, Josh Martin said: If the example you provided had involved a non-disciplinary motion to censure instead, I would still be in agreement that the rule on 45:5 would be applicable. That would not be necessarily divisible, especially if they were being censured for the same thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts