Guest CraigP Posted December 4, 2023 at 02:19 PM Report Share Posted December 4, 2023 at 02:19 PM At a prior meeting our chair took it upon himself to propose a motion on an item listed under new business as part of his regular report. It was done at the start of the meeting before everyone had arrived, although there was a quorum present. It seems as if it was done to head off debate later, but that's my own thought. The chair making the motion during his report and tackling business items out of the listed order both seem like improper actions. Requests to reconsider the topic were subsequently denied. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shmuel Gerber Posted December 4, 2023 at 07:47 PM Report Share Posted December 4, 2023 at 07:47 PM On 12/4/2023 at 9:19 AM, Guest CraigP said: At a prior meeting our chair took it upon himself to propose a motion on an item listed under new business as part of his regular report. It was done at the start of the meeting before everyone had arrived, although there was a quorum present. It seems as if it was done to head off debate later, but that's my own thought. The chair making the motion during his report and tackling business items out of the listed order both seem like improper actions. Requests to reconsider the topic were subsequently denied. Do you have a question? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shmuel Gerber Posted December 4, 2023 at 07:50 PM Report Share Posted December 4, 2023 at 07:50 PM On 12/4/2023 at 2:47 PM, Shmuel Gerber said: Do you have a question? I see now that you put a question in the title of the topic. The president can give a report that includes recommendations, although it is best practice for another member to move their implementation. As far as taking up a question before its appointed time, I would want to know how it came to appear under New Business to begin with. But in any case, once the question has been decided it is too late to raise a point of order about these irregularities. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atul Kapur Posted December 4, 2023 at 09:33 PM Report Share Posted December 4, 2023 at 09:33 PM On 12/4/2023 at 9:19 AM, Guest CraigP said: Requests to reconsider the topic were subsequently denied. The wording seems to suggest that it was made as a request to, and denied by, the chair. The proper procedure is that a motion to Reconsider is made and seconded and, unless it is out of order for some reason, is considered by the assembly and decided by a vote. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest CraigP Posted December 5, 2023 at 05:51 PM Report Share Posted December 5, 2023 at 05:51 PM On 12/4/2023 at 2:50 PM, Shmuel Gerber said: I see now that you put a question in the title of the topic. The president can give a report that includes recommendations, although it is best practice for another member to move their implementation. As far as taking up a question before its appointed time, I would want to know how it came to appear under New Business to begin with. But in any case, once the question has been decided it is too late to raise a point of order about these irregularities. The topic was listed under new business on the agenda, It was a decision that I would have debated against, but I was late and was moved up to first thing on the agenda by the chair which by my reading isn't a permitted action for an agenda item. A motion to reconsider we denied by the chair without explanation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joshua Katz Posted December 5, 2023 at 06:03 PM Report Share Posted December 5, 2023 at 06:03 PM On 12/5/2023 at 12:51 PM, Guest CraigP said: A motion to reconsider we denied by the chair without explanation. Well that is certainly improper. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest CraigP Posted December 5, 2023 at 06:22 PM Report Share Posted December 5, 2023 at 06:22 PM The motions was targeted at me in particular, so yeah kinda sore about it.. But I thought I read restriction on the chair changing the order of business as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joshua Katz Posted December 5, 2023 at 06:24 PM Report Share Posted December 5, 2023 at 06:24 PM Was there an adopted agenda? If so I agree that taking up an item of business before it appears on the agenda is out of order without a motion to suspend the rules. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Novosielski Posted December 5, 2023 at 10:28 PM Report Share Posted December 5, 2023 at 10:28 PM On 12/5/2023 at 1:22 PM, Guest CraigP said: The motions was targeted at me in particular, so yeah kinda sore about it.. But I thought I read restriction on the chair changing the order of business as well. Well, yes, the chair acting alone has no power to change the orders of the day, nor for that matter the power to deny a motion to Reconsider, without an explanation of what rule would be violated by entertaining it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest CraigP Posted December 6, 2023 at 01:31 PM Report Share Posted December 6, 2023 at 01:31 PM On 12/5/2023 at 1:24 PM, Joshua Katz said: Was there an adopted agenda? If so I agree that taking up an item of business before it appears on the agenda is out of order without a motion to suspend the rules. Yes that's what I thought. There is an agenda for every meeting, typically there is no formal adopting of it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest CraigP Posted December 6, 2023 at 01:32 PM Report Share Posted December 6, 2023 at 01:32 PM On 12/5/2023 at 5:28 PM, Gary Novosielski said: Well, yes, the chair acting alone has no power to change the orders of the day, nor for that matter the power to deny a motion to Reconsider, without an explanation of what rule would be violated by entertaining it. "We already voted on it" was as much explanation as I got. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Honemann Posted December 6, 2023 at 02:15 PM Report Share Posted December 6, 2023 at 02:15 PM On 12/6/2023 at 8:31 AM, Guest CraigP said: Yes that's what I thought. There is an agenda for every meeting, typically there is no formal adopting of it. If an agenda is not properly adopted, it has no force or effect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Novosielski Posted December 6, 2023 at 02:40 PM Report Share Posted December 6, 2023 at 02:40 PM On 12/6/2023 at 8:31 AM, Guest CraigP said: Yes that's what I thought. There is an agenda for every meeting, typically there is no formal adopting of it. That changes my answer. If the "agenda" is not adopted by the assembly, it is then more in the nature of a memorandum of business items to be handled, as an aid to the presiding officer, but it is not binding. Therefore, the presiding officer has more leeway, but still must stay within the proper heading of the Standard Order of Business unless the assembly agrees to Suspend the Rules to take up an item out of its regular order. The Standard Order of Business comprises the following subdivisions: 1) Reading and Approval of Minutes 2) Reports of Officers, Boards, and Standing Committees 3) Reports of Special (Select or Ad Hoc) Committees 4) Special Orders 5) Unfinished Business and General Orders 6) New Business In organizations that have adopted RONR as their parliamentary authority, that hold their regular meetings as frequently as quarterly, and have not adopted a special order of business, this series of headings is their prescribed order of business. [see RONR (12th ed.) 41:5 ff.] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joshua Katz Posted December 6, 2023 at 02:43 PM Report Share Posted December 6, 2023 at 02:43 PM On 12/6/2023 at 8:32 AM, Guest CraigP said: "We already voted on it" was as much explanation as I got. Your chair clearly does not understand the motion to reconsider. Or pretends not to. The ruling should have been appealed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest CraigP Posted December 6, 2023 at 06:10 PM Report Share Posted December 6, 2023 at 06:10 PM On 12/6/2023 at 9:43 AM, Joshua Katz said: Your chair clearly does not understand the motion to reconsider. Or pretends not to. The ruling should have been appealed. We're working on it... If Reconsider wasn't recognized Appeal would have been equally fruitless, as I was appealing both his motion and decision not to revisit it. At this point actually mostly the damage is done, but I can see if we can rescind it or nullify it based on the failure to follow the rules. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Novosielski Posted December 6, 2023 at 06:30 PM Report Share Posted December 6, 2023 at 06:30 PM On 12/6/2023 at 1:10 PM, Guest CraigP said: If Reconsider wasn't recognized Appeal would have been equally fruitless, as I was appealing both his motion and decision not to revisit it. It's only fruitless if you acquiesce to the chair's behavior. 62:9 Likewise, if the chair ignores an appeal appropriately made and seconded, a member can repeat the appeal and if, despite its being seconded, the chair ignores it again, the member can repeat it a third time and if it is again seconded but still ignored by the chair, the member can immediately, standing in his place, put the appeal to a vote without debate. The question may be put as: “Shall the decision of the chair be sustained?” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest CraigP Posted December 6, 2023 at 08:56 PM Report Share Posted December 6, 2023 at 08:56 PM On 12/6/2023 at 1:30 PM, Gary Novosielski said: It's only fruitless if you acquiesce to the chair's behavior. 62:9 Likewise, if the chair ignores an appeal appropriately made and seconded, a member can repeat the appeal and if, despite its being seconded, the chair ignores it again, the member can repeat it a third time and if it is again seconded but still ignored by the chair, the member can immediately, standing in his place, put the appeal to a vote without debate. The question may be put as: “Shall the decision of the chair be sustained?” I wasn't that deep into the rules of order yet! Although had I done it I think I would just have annoyed enough members they wouldn't vote for the appeal. I just took over the chair so I am making a point to learn.. This prior motion will smack into new events again if it stays in effect, so I'm trying to amend, rescind or nullify, the board doesn't share my enthusiasm and just figures we'll stop enforcing it. They're not wrong... but also it's not right... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest CraigP Posted December 6, 2023 at 09:02 PM Report Share Posted December 6, 2023 at 09:02 PM On 12/6/2023 at 9:40 AM, Gary Novosielski said: That changes my answer. If the "agenda" is not adopted by the assembly, it is then more in the nature of a memorandum of business items to be handled, as an aid to the presiding officer, but it is not binding. Therefore, the presiding officer has more leeway, but still must stay within the proper heading of the Standard Order of Business unless the assembly agrees to Suspend the Rules to take up an item out of its regular order. The Standard Order of Business comprises the following subdivisions: 1) Reading and Approval of Minutes 2) Reports of Officers, Boards, and Standing Committees 3) Reports of Special (Select or Ad Hoc) Committees 4) Special Orders 5) Unfinished Business and General Orders 6) New Business In organizations that have adopted RONR as their parliamentary authority, that hold their regular meetings as frequently as quarterly, and have not adopted a special order of business, this series of headings is their prescribed order of business. [see RONR (12th ed.) 41:5 ff.] Gary sorry just went far enough up to read this, so does it really change your answer if our agenda mirrors the standard order of business? It would be the same effect, an improper action. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Novosielski Posted December 6, 2023 at 11:41 PM Report Share Posted December 6, 2023 at 11:41 PM On 12/6/2023 at 4:02 PM, Guest CraigP said: Gary sorry just went far enough up to read this, so does it really change your answer if our agenda mirrors the standard order of business? It would be the same effect, an improper action. It depends (Doesn't it always?). The Standard Order (or, for that matter, a proper agenda) would not have any items listed under New Business in the first place. If this is an item the President wants to handle early in the meeting it's easy enough to include it under Reports of Officers, viz. of the President. As Shmuel points out, officers normally would not move their own recommendations, but rather have a member do it. Anyway, at this point there's nothing to be done except to learn for next time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts