Jump to content
The Official RONR Q & A Forums

Taking Minutes


Alfred T.

Recommended Posts

Hello:

Our Church has a membership of less than 50 members, and I am its Secretary. I would appreciate answers to the following:(1) Is it contrary to the Robert's Rules of Order,when submitting the Minutes, to add: Respectfully Submitted by: John B. Doe- Secretary ? (2)Is it contrary to the Rules of Order to have the Secretary and President sign the Minutes ?

Thanks in advance for your response(s)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(1) Is it contrary to the Robert's Rules of Order, when submitting the Minutes, to add: Respectfully Submitted by: John B. Doe- Secretary?

(2) Is it contrary to the Rules of Order to have the Secretary and President sign the Minutes?

1. Not contrary; just obsolete.

RONR acknowledges that the practice exists. But RONR's sample minutes does not use the phrase.

2. Not necessary.

But RONR acknowledges that the practice exists to have two signatures (where only one is the rule).

Excerpt from RONR page 454:

The words 'Respectfully submitted' - although occasionally used - represent an older practice that is not essential in signing the minutes.

... and ...

Minutes should be signed by the secretary and can also be signed, if the assembly wishes, by the president.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excerpt from RONR page 454:

Quote

The words 'Respectfully submitted' - although occasionally used - represent an older practice that is not essential in signing the minutes.

... and ...

Minutes should be signed by the secretary and can also be signed, if the assembly wishes, by the president.

Which exactly answers the question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...