Discussion of Motion

[Guest Judy]

Does a motion have to be seconded before discussion can begin? In other words, a discussion would be held to get an idea of how most members feel about the subject at hand and THEN it can be seconded? We were always taught that discussion never begins until the motion is seconded. However, recently I was told differently.

[George Mervosh]

Once a motion is made and discussion begins (it shouldn't without a second) the lack of a second becomes irrelevant and it doesn't need seconded at that point. You were taught correctly, and told something that is not correct.

See RONR, pp. 35-36

[Tim Wynn]

Does a motion have to be seconded before discussion can begin? In other words, a discussion would be held to get an idea of how most members feel about the subject at hand and THEN it can be seconded? We were always taught that discussion never begins until the motion is seconded. However, recently I was told differently.

Debate should generally be limited to the merits of the pending question. Without a motion, you don't have a question to debate.

The purpose of the requirement for a second is to ensure that time is not wasted on consideration of a motion that only one person wants to consider.