Guest KCP Posted April 18, 2011 at 02:01 AM Report Share Posted April 18, 2011 at 02:01 AM Do minutes still have to be printed out and signed or can electronic copies be kept and an electronic signature used? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Harrison Posted April 18, 2011 at 02:14 AM Report Share Posted April 18, 2011 at 02:14 AM Do minutes still have to be printed out and signed or can electronic copies be kept and an electronic signature used?RONR p. 451 says:The minutes should be kept in a substantial book or binder.which suggests that the minutes must be in a physical form. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Novosielski Posted April 18, 2011 at 02:15 AM Report Share Posted April 18, 2011 at 02:15 AM Do minutes still have to be printed out and signed or can electronic copies be kept and an electronic signature used?RONR says minutes should be kept "in a substantial book or binder". But there's no rule against keeping electronic copies too, since they would greatly facilitate searching past minutes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rev Ed Posted April 18, 2011 at 03:33 AM Report Share Posted April 18, 2011 at 03:33 AM RONR requires a hardcopy - which is probably a good idea if the computer crashes or a the electronic information is otherwise compromised. However, an electronic version may be a good idea as a back-up and as suggested as a way to provide a quick search of past Minutes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Harrison Posted April 18, 2011 at 04:12 AM Report Share Posted April 18, 2011 at 04:12 AM If you do store the minutes electronically as well as having them in hard copy you will want to make sure that they both say the same thing. For example if the paper minutes from a meeting months before gets amended and you don't update the electronic copy it will be confusing for a member in the future who notices the discrepancy between the hard and the e-copy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rev Ed Posted April 19, 2011 at 03:22 AM Report Share Posted April 19, 2011 at 03:22 AM And while RONR would indicate that the hardcopy is the default legit version, if an e-copy is to be retained, it is perhaps advisable that the organization adopt a rule indicating that the hardcopy is the official version, but that e-copies are retained for ease of access and information only. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Novosielski Posted April 19, 2011 at 09:57 AM Report Share Posted April 19, 2011 at 09:57 AM And while RONR would indicate that the hardcopy is the default legit version, if an e-copy is to be retained, it is perhaps advisable that the organization adopt a rule indicating that the hardcopy is the official version, but that e-copies are retained for ease of access and information only.Since RONR already says that, I don't see the advantage. Duplicating rules leads to trouble down the road. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.