Guest Betty troyer Posted April 22, 2011 at 05:58 PM Report Share Posted April 22, 2011 at 05:58 PM What are the notice requirements for a Special Meeting? I've heard and read so many different answers but really need to know the correct one. Thank you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Mervosh Posted April 22, 2011 at 05:59 PM Report Share Posted April 22, 2011 at 05:59 PM There is only one......the one that's found in your bylaws. If it's not there, you can't have them so don't sweat it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Betty Troyer Posted April 22, 2011 at 06:13 PM Report Share Posted April 22, 2011 at 06:13 PM This is what our by-laws say " Special meetings of the Board may be called by the Chair, three Trustees or Directors as applicable to the Board being called to convene, or by the Chief or Assistant Chief." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Betty Troyer Posted April 22, 2011 at 06:23 PM Report Share Posted April 22, 2011 at 06:23 PM What is your interpretation of the above? (by-laws) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Mervosh Posted April 22, 2011 at 06:24 PM Report Share Posted April 22, 2011 at 06:24 PM RONR says a "reasonable" number of days, and also says it should be in the bylaws.I'm almost certainly alone in this opinion, but in my view the clause quoted is incomplete and no special meeting should be called until the bylaws are amended to properly state a certain number of days. At the time that amendment is debated you can agree on what is reasonable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Novosielski Posted April 22, 2011 at 06:57 PM Report Share Posted April 22, 2011 at 06:57 PM I'm almost certainly alone in this opinion, but in my view the clause quoted is incomplete and no special meeting should be called until the bylaws are amended to properly state a certain number of days. At the time that amendment is debated you can agree on what is reasonable.Yes, I think it's a stretch to claim that what is clearly authorized in the bylaws should be ignored. I believe that in the absence of provisions related to notice, the default provisions in RONR apply. By definition, as a "called" meeting, notice is required. It must be sent to all members a "reasonable" time in advance. It must contain a statement of the purpose of the meeting, and no business may be transacted at the called meeting except that for which the meeting was called. Yes, RONR recommends including these provisions explicitly, for reasons of clarity, but [even if] they are omitted they still apply."Reasonable" should mean that members have enough advance notice to decide whether the issue is important enough for them to attend, and to change their plans if need be. Answers will vary, but if you ask me, I'd say a week would be nice, three-to-five days would usually be acceptable, and in a pinch, say, 48 hours. But nobody asked me, and I'm not a member. You'll have to figure it out. And yes, once you do, it would be wise to amend your bylaws to make it clear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hmtcastle Posted April 22, 2011 at 10:45 PM Report Share Posted April 22, 2011 at 10:45 PM This is what our by-laws say " Special meetings of the Board may be called by the Chair, three Trustees or Directors as applicable to the Board being called to convene, or by the Chief or Assistant Chief."Unless you have both a Board of Trustees and a Board of Directors (and, if you do, to which board does "the board" refer?), it looks like you may have adopted some "boilerplate" language without altering it to suit your particular organization. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.