Guest Judith Nanez Posted October 18, 2011 at 04:27 PM Report Share Posted October 18, 2011 at 04:27 PM If during a Board of directors meeting a motion is made and and is passed by a 9 yes 3 no vote. Can it be brought up at the next meeting by a Board Member who chose not to attend the meeting in which it was voted on. That same person told board members who could and could not vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Harrison Posted October 18, 2011 at 04:32 PM Report Share Posted October 18, 2011 at 04:32 PM Depending on whether the motion has been fully executed it might be subject to Rescission or Amendment. See RONR pp. 305-310 for details. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David A Foulkes Posted October 18, 2011 at 04:36 PM Report Share Posted October 18, 2011 at 04:36 PM That same person told board members who could and could not vote.Wha????? I mean..... huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Edgar Posted October 18, 2011 at 04:38 PM Report Share Posted October 18, 2011 at 04:38 PM That same person told board members who could and could not vote.And he did this based on . . . ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rev Ed Posted October 18, 2011 at 10:22 PM Report Share Posted October 18, 2011 at 10:22 PM Also, his vote would not have changed the outcome. So why bother. If I were the Chairman, I'd rule out the motion out of order. Now, if it was a motion to alter the original motion (i.e. to rescind or amend something previously adopted) then I would rule it in motion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Edgar Posted October 18, 2011 at 10:46 PM Report Share Posted October 18, 2011 at 10:46 PM I would rule it in motionAn interesting ruling, to be sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rev Ed Posted October 18, 2011 at 11:28 PM Report Share Posted October 18, 2011 at 11:28 PM Sorry, I mean "in order." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Wynn Posted October 19, 2011 at 02:31 AM Report Share Posted October 19, 2011 at 02:31 AM ... then I would rule it in motion.A moving violation, then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Novosielski Posted October 19, 2011 at 02:51 AM Report Share Posted October 19, 2011 at 02:51 AM A moving violation, then? Very moving. There was nary a dry seat eye in the house. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.