Leo Posted October 30, 2012 at 01:47 PM Report Share Posted October 30, 2012 at 01:47 PM The bylaws of a national association inc., state, "a special meeting of a local constituent association inc., may be called by the president of the state association inc."The bylaws are silent on who conducts the called special meeting.Does the state association president call the special meeting, and the local constituent association's duly elected officers conduct the special meeting?orDoes the state association president call the special meeting of the local constituent association and conduct the special meeting? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jstackpo Posted October 30, 2012 at 01:54 PM Report Share Posted October 30, 2012 at 01:54 PM Answering an "either / or" question in the best possible way...Yes.But I'd lean toward the Local association chair running the meeting, since it is that association that is meeting, no matter how the meeting got called.Since there is no rule it comes to a matter of bylaw interpretation if there is a conflict when the meeting is opened -- I can picture the two presidents fighting over the gavel. An appealed point of order would settle the question. Then amend bylaws to write a rule. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Harrison Posted October 30, 2012 at 01:57 PM Report Share Posted October 30, 2012 at 01:57 PM Since there is no rule it comes to a matter of bylaw interpretation if there is a conflict when the meeting is opened -- I can picture the two presidents fighting over the gavel. An appealed point of order would settle the question. Then amend bylaws to write a rule.Yeah, but who would rule on the Point of Order and preside over the Appeal?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Edgar Posted October 30, 2012 at 02:27 PM Report Share Posted October 30, 2012 at 02:27 PM But I'd lean toward the Local association chair running the meeting, since it is that association that is meeting, no matter how the meeting got called.I'd lean that way too, and for that reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sean Hunt Posted October 30, 2012 at 07:09 PM Report Share Posted October 30, 2012 at 07:09 PM Yeah, but who would rule on the Point of Order and preside over the Appeal?? Whoever called the meeting to order. If there was a serious argument, I would say that whoever was presiding should submit the question of who presides over the Appeal immediately and without debate, and then allow the Appeal to resolve the ambiguity in the rules for the remainder of the meeting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.