Jump to content
The Official RONR Q & A Forums

board member not invited to board meeting


Guest Rob

Recommended Posts

I have a duel relationship with a board of directors.

1. I am an independent contractor (association manager) serving as executive director to an association.

2. In the bylaws, it says the executive director is a full member of the board of directors.

The board met and merged the association/corporation (really disolved it) into another professional association. I was not informed that the discussions were happening and was not informed of the board meeting (time, day, topics...) when the decision was ultimately made.

a. I wonder, under my duel relationship to the association, is this acceptable?

b. Can they say this was an employment issue and therefore I should not be in the room?

c. Is it ok to ever have a board meeting without telling all board members of the meeting?

d. If not, did they have a legitimate meeting?

e. Lastly, should I resign the board while I finish out the 30 day period under our contract?

I honestly do not plan to protest but want to understand the situation.

Thanks,

Rob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a. I wonder, under my duel relationship to the association, is this acceptable?

No. If you are a full member of the Board of Directors, you have a right to be notified of and attend all meetings.

b. Can they say this was an employment issue and therefore I should not be in the room?

Sure, but it doesn't change that, as a member, you have a right to be notified of an attend all meetings.

c. Is it ok to ever have a board meeting without telling all board members of the meeting?

No.

d. If not, did they have a legitimate meeting?

No.

e. Lastly, should I resign the board while I finish out the 30 day period under our contract?

That's up to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a. No, but not because of any dual capacity. You are a Board member; you should be notified of all Board meetings.

b. Well, they can say it, but that doesn't change anything. See a.

c. Nope. p. 251

d. Probably, but you have grounds for contesting (do any good? I dunno) the decisions reached at the meeting.

e. That one is up to you. I suspect it would be wise not to endanger your contract obligations in any way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

d. Probably, but you have grounds for contesting (do any good? I dunno) the decisions reached at the meeting.

Hm. I'm not sure it makes any difference, but since the violation was whether the notice was proper (in that it was not sent to all members), it would seem to me that the meeting itself is invalid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a duel relationship with a board of directors.

Freudian slip? ;)

I would wonder about the whole "The board met and merged the association/corporation (really disolved it) into another professional association." - is there also a general membership, who may also expect to play a part in these decisions?

If the OP wishes to pursue this, there would be some parliamentary grounds to do so. If the OP does not wish to pursue this, I would concur with the resigning from the Board option - you don't want to be seen as condoning this behaviour by the board. Go for a dignified protest and resignation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the great information.

There is an issue with the "merging" of the association. There is a general membership and the change was not presented or put to a vote. I believe this is a bylaw violation but the board seems to be not addressing this issue. Unrest is moving and at least one group of 20 members is threatening some action.

The association has nearly $400K in reserves that will be used largely to fund a thrid entity that is a for-profit and designed to drive business to select members of both (soon to be one) association. All association members will be given the opportunity to buy into the third entity, referred to as a co-op, but if they do not pay the additional fee, they will not benefit from the co-op.

Eight of my board members are co-owners/co-op members of the third entity/co-op. Some of the board members of the association being merged into are also co-op partners.

How, if at all, does this change/enhance you discussions points above?

Thanks agian,

Rob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How, if at all, does this change/enhance you discussions points above?

Well, I agree with you that the merger likely violates the Bylaws. Unless your Bylaws have customized procedures, a merger requires that the organization follow the same procedures as for amending its Bylaws, which generally means a vote by the general membership with some requirement of previous notice. See RONR, 11th ed., pgs. 562-563; pgs. 580-582. So it looks like lack of proper notice is not the only problem with the board's actions.

The other comments you've raised seem beyond the scope of parliamentary procedure - and are likely moot anyway, since the merger itself may be null and void. I think the other points do suggest, however, that there are likely legal issues involved here, which means that members wishing to contest this may need to consult a lawyer.

What/where is the citation that the meeting is invalid for lack of proper notice?

See RONR, 11th ed., pg. 91, lines 31-35; pg. 251, lines 3-6, 20-23; pg. 263, line 29 - pg. 264, line 5.

Does this only apply to a special meeting or a regular meeting as well, where the member customarily receives notice/invitation?

It depends on how the regular meetings are scheduled. See RONR, 11th ed., pg. 89, lines 5-15.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...