Guest Commissioner Posted March 13, 2015 at 05:28 AM Report Share Posted March 13, 2015 at 05:28 AM Roberts Rule Of Order on guidelines for nominating committee members running for office. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jstackpo Posted March 13, 2015 at 10:47 AM Report Share Posted March 13, 2015 at 10:47 AM No problem. No rule against it -- p. 433, line 29ff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Novosielski Posted March 13, 2015 at 12:33 PM Report Share Posted March 13, 2015 at 12:33 PM Being on the nominating committee doesn't prevent you from "running" for an office, or even being nominated for the office by the nominating committee. If it could prevent you, nefarious types would probably use that to prevent people from running by sticking them on the nominating committee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shmuel Gerber Posted March 13, 2015 at 04:32 PM Report Share Posted March 13, 2015 at 04:32 PM Being on the nominating committee doesn't prevent you from "running" for an office, or even being nominated for the office by the nominating committee. If it could prevent you, nefarious types would probably use that to prevent people from running by sticking them on the nominating committee. But no one can be "stuck" onto a committee without agreeing to be, at least tacitly, unless the bylaws say so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Novosielski Posted March 13, 2015 at 04:44 PM Report Share Posted March 13, 2015 at 04:44 PM But no one can be "stuck" onto a committee without agreeing to be, at least tacitly, unless the bylaws say so. That's true. Perhaps it would be necessary to hoodwink them. No rule in RONR would prohibit that. And yet...Members of the nominating committee are not barred from becoming nominees for office themselves. To make such a requirement would mean, first, that service on the nominating committee carried a penalty by depriving its members of one of their privileges; and second, that appointment or election to the nominating committee could be used to prevent a member from becoming a nominee. [emphasis added] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shmuel Gerber Posted March 13, 2015 at 05:56 PM Report Share Posted March 13, 2015 at 05:56 PM And yet...Members of the nominating committee are not barred from becoming nominees for office themselves. To make such a requirement would mean, first, that service on the nominating committee carried a penalty by depriving its members of one of their privileges; and second, that appointment or election to the nominating committee could be used to prevent a member from becoming a nominee. [emphasis added]Well, I was hoping maybe you could explain that. I don't take the second sentence to mean that there is anything nefarious about making such a requirement, and I think many organizations, especially large ones, might find it perfectly reasonable to make members' service on the nominating committee contingent on their relinquishing the privilege of being a nominee, or at least of being nominated by the committee itself. RONR is pointing out the consequences of this requirement, which is not imposed by RONR itself and can therefore be imposed only by a provision in the bylaws. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.