Jump to content
The Official RONR Q & A Forums

Elections - 2/3 Majority Vote Requirement


Guest Andrewl

Recommended Posts

I am in a sorority and we require a 2/3 majority vote for officers. We had ballot votes and for members who were absent at the meeting, ballots were mailed to them to cast their votes.  Two candidates were on the ballot for secretary and the vote total was 9 to 10. Since there was not 2/3 majority and our bylaws didn't address the issues, we were not sure how to declare a winner. Some said the person with 10 votes win and others said we revote but it was not clear if we would again send in ballots to absent members if we revote or if we revote with just the members who were present.  Please help. I have RROONR 10th edition and page reference would be great to support any response. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have an incomplete election. Keep voting until it's completed (i.e someone is elected and accepts).

 

Look in the Index under "Elections, incomplete".

 

All members can vote whether or not they voted in the first round. 

 

Absentee voting is prohibited (by RONR) unless authorized in your bylaws (or mandated by some superior rule or law).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To add to the reply by Mr. Guest, if you are allowing  absentee ballots, you need to allow them again on the re-votes.  But they are not permissible (and were not allowable in the first round of voting) unless your bylaws authorize them or they are mandated by some superior rule or law.

 

What you experienced is one of the problems with mixing absentee ballots with in person voting.  You could have kept voting at the meeting until you had a winner if only in person voting was allowed, but, because of the absentee ballots, you have to send them out again....and possibly again and again.... until you have a winner.

 

Your situation is another example of why a two thirds vote is rarely required to elect someone to office.  It is harder to achieve and is more likely to cause an incomplete election and the need for repeat balloting than would be the case with a majority vote requirement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So we should not be sending ballots to people who do not attend the meeting correct.  Our bylaws dont authorize but they do include language that lets everyone that the third Saturday in April is when the elections are held every two years. At the next meeting, it seems that we have to vote with members present at the meeting and keep voting until we have a winner correct? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry and if this should be posted as a new questions let me know but for clarification, since we "illegally" mailed ballots before, do we keep doing it this way? Don't know if it matters or not but this was the only contested position on the ballot so im not sure if we can just correct the error and vote at the next meeting or if we have to continue doing it wrong since that is how we started.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks. I couldnt agree more. Working with a group of people who are use to doing things how they want instead of doing them correctly. It is going to be a fight to get them to agree not to do the absentee but I got a lot of fight in me. Again thanks for your help. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...