Sanders Posted July 2, 2018 at 02:52 AM Report Share Posted July 2, 2018 at 02:52 AM I belong to a small nonprofit club. If some members do not agree with a decision made by the board, what is the correct action to take - if any? Am I correctly interpreting Robert's Rules if I tell my fellow discontented members that we need to give a notice to the club that we plan on asking for the decision to be rescinded? I was reading that if notice is not given, then the new motion has to be approved by 2/3 or the majority of the entire membership? If so, how do you know whether the approval has to come from 2/3 or majority? Or is there no recourse? I looked the bylaws and they state that the Board is given authority to manage the club's affairs and they shall adopt policies as they deem necessary, so I don't think the decision they made was outside their scope of power. I'm trying to figure out if we have anything we can do to overturn the decision - also how to do it the correct way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jstackpo Posted July 2, 2018 at 09:48 AM Report Share Posted July 2, 2018 at 09:48 AM Possibly may depend on your bylaws (although the state laws, if applicable, would supersede). Do your bylaws give exclusive authority to the board? If not your course of action is entirely correct. The 2/3 vote vs. majority of entire membership question is easy: whichever one is easiest to obtain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Honemann Posted July 2, 2018 at 11:47 AM Report Share Posted July 2, 2018 at 11:47 AM I'd be inclined to state this in a different way. For example, if all members are present one might say that it will be "easier" to obtain a majority vote of the entire membership than a two-thirds vote, but, of course, a two-thirds vote, even if not a majority of the entire membership, will suffice. In other words, I think it's better to say that either one will suffice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Wynn Posted July 2, 2018 at 12:48 PM Report Share Posted July 2, 2018 at 12:48 PM 9 hours ago, Sanders said: If so, how do you know whether the approval has to come from 2/3 or majority? If the result of the vote achieves either, the motion is adopted. EXAMPLE 1: 100 Members Total 30 Present in a Meeting 2 Vote in Favor; 1 Votes Against Two-thirds vote is achieved. Motion is adopted. EXAMPLE 2: 100 Members Total 90 Present in a Meeting 54 Vote in Favor; 36 Vote Against Majority of the entire membership is achieved. Motion is adopted. You don't TRY for one threshold over the other, as many people mistakenly assume. In the right circumstance, you may get both, but you only need one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Wynn Posted July 2, 2018 at 12:50 PM Report Share Posted July 2, 2018 at 12:50 PM 9 hours ago, Sanders said: Am I correctly interpreting Robert's Rules if I tell my fellow discontented members that we need to give a notice to the club that we plan on asking for the decision to be rescinded? No, giving notice only reduces the vote requirement. Notice is not necessary for adoption of the motion to Rescind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Wynn Posted July 2, 2018 at 12:53 PM Report Share Posted July 2, 2018 at 12:53 PM (edited) 10 hours ago, Sanders said: . . . I don't think the decision they made was outside their scope of power. If the board took action without authority, you wouldn't be rescinding that action, you would be raising a point of order that the action is null and void. Rescind (or Amend Something Previously Adopted) would be the proper motion for countermanding a motion properly adopted by a subordinate board. Edited July 2, 2018 at 12:57 PM by Tim Wynn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest linda Posted September 22, 2021 at 02:13 AM Report Share Posted September 22, 2021 at 02:13 AM Our previous board made a decision without the membership being involved to suspend a members status to be "not in good standing for 5 years" Many members feel this was too much. after 3 years of this status we would like the new board to reconsider lowering the suspension to the 3 years the member has already served and return her to in good standing status. is this possible and how do we handle it T Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. J. Posted September 25, 2021 at 12:55 AM Report Share Posted September 25, 2021 at 12:55 AM (edited) Please start a new thread. Edited September 25, 2021 at 01:19 AM by J. J. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts