Jump to content
The Official RONR Q & A Forums

Term Limits


Guest Committee702

Recommended Posts

Our Bylaws state 

"Each board member shall serve a one-year term and no more than two consecutive years in the same position. A board member may serve in a previously held position after taking a year off." 

The questions is, if a member wants to be in the same position for two consecutive years, do they still need to be voted in for that second year or can they automatically serve two years? Our bylaws don't present an answer. Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/12/2024 at 1:17 PM, Guest Committee702 said:

Our Bylaws state 

"Each board member shall serve a one-year term and no more than two consecutive years in the same position. A board member may serve in a previously held position after taking a year off." 

The questions is, if a member wants to be in the same position for two consecutive years, do they still need to be voted in for that second year or can they automatically serve two years? Our bylaws don't present an answer. Thoughts?

Yes, he must be elected again to serve for another year because board members are elected for a term of one year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/12/2024 at 1:17 PM, Guest Committee702 said:

Our Bylaws state 

"Each board member shall serve a one-year term and no more than two consecutive years in the same position. A board member may serve in a previously held position after taking a year off." 

The questions is, if a member wants to be in the same position for two consecutive years, do they still need to be voted in for that second year or can they automatically serve two years? Our bylaws don't present an answer. Thoughts?

Actually, they do present an answer.  They say that the term of office is one year.  So to achieve a second term would require reëlection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, they do need to be elected again.  This is a variation on the Grover Cleveland case (Cleveland, to date, is the only person elected President twice but in non-consecutive terms.)

But, that Bylaw should be amended to far better wording, such as what is explained in RONR 56:27-30.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...