Guest PhiSigGirl Posted September 23, 2010 at 12:45 AM Report Share Posted September 23, 2010 at 12:45 AM In a discussion prior to a vote may a general assembly or any member bring up points that were not discussed during the speech or election process? Is it "allowed" to bring outside knowledge of a candidate to discussion if it is pertaining to the person's ability to complete the job? Respectfully, PhiSigGirl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jstackpo Posted September 23, 2010 at 12:52 AM Report Share Posted September 23, 2010 at 12:52 AM RONR has no rule saying "No". Since elections are debatable, it would seem that any (relevant) information is fair game. No slander, please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob Elsman Posted September 23, 2010 at 12:52 AM Report Share Posted September 23, 2010 at 12:52 AM In a discussion prior to a vote may a general assembly or any member bring up points that were not discussed during the speech or election process? Is it "allowed" to bring outside knowledge of a candidate to discussion if it is pertaining to the person's ability to complete the job? Respectfully, PhiSigGirlRemarks in debate that have a direct bearing on whether Mr. X should be elected to the office are permitted. For example, it is permitted to bring up the prior conviction for embezzlement of the nominee for treasurer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.