Jump to content
The Official RONR Q & A Forums

Quorum and votes required


Guest SRB

Recommended Posts

Our rules state the following:

Quorum
Four members shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business; but a lesser number may meet and adjourn.
Lately this is being interpreted to mean that four votes are required to pass any motion. I'm looking for a good definition of quorum in this context, as it is my contention that in this context the word transact only means conduct a valid meeting. There are certain types of motions that have specific vote requirements so I am focused on all those not otherwise specified in our rules.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The quorum is the minimum number of voting members that must be assembled at a properly called meeting in order to conduct business.

But the "standard" by which RONR judges a motion passed is a majority (more than half) of votes cast. Let's quickly state here that abstentions (when a member does not vote aye or no) do not count.

So, if you have four members present, but for a motion only 3 vote, 2 for and 1 against, then the motion passes. The same would hold true in this case for a motion that required a 2/3 vote to pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RONR p. 20 says:

The minimum number of members who must be present at the meetings of a deliberative assembly for business to be legally transacted is the quorum of the assembly.

and p. 334 says:

As indicated on pages 20-21, a quorum in an assembly is the number of voting members (see definition, p. 3) who must be present in order that business can be legally transacted. The quorum refers to the number of such members present, not to the number actually voting on a particular question.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our rules state the following:

Quorum
Four members shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business; but a lesser number may meet and adjourn.
Lately this is being interpreted to mean that four votes are required to pass any motion. I'm looking for a good definition of quorum in this context, as it is my contention that in this context the word transact only means conduct a valid meeting. There are certain types of motions that have specific vote requirements so I am focused on all those not otherwise specified in our rules.

The "but..." clause needs to be gotten rid of. It's inclusion could rightly be interpreted to prohibit the other actions that an assembly can take under the rules in the absence of a quorum, RONR (10th ed.), pp. 336, 337, 571.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...