Guest Harold Posted September 17, 2012 at 07:59 PM Report Share Posted September 17, 2012 at 07:59 PM Motion made and passed at previous meeting that was reflected in the minutes. Now some of the board members believe the motion was for one thing while others believe it was something different. When the topic for approval of last meeting's minutes comes up, and the vote say is a tie, what do we do to get past this impasse? Revote? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Edgar Posted September 17, 2012 at 08:06 PM Report Share Posted September 17, 2012 at 08:06 PM When the topic for approval of last meeting's minutes comes up, and the vote say is a tie, what do we do to get past this impasse? Revote?If the motion to correct the draft minutes results in a tie, the motion is defeated and the draft remains as is.But you don't vote on the final approval, just on any controversial corrections.QAW67b Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Mervosh Posted September 17, 2012 at 08:06 PM Report Share Posted September 17, 2012 at 08:06 PM When the secretary's draft is up for approval, a tie vote on a proposed amendment to correct the record defeats the proposed amendment and the language in the draft stands.Therefore the motion, as worded in the draft, is the official record of what was adopted.Any member can propose to amend the adopted motion itself in most cases (RONR (11th ed.), p. 305ff), but good luck with that if the board is equally split. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g40 Posted September 17, 2012 at 10:10 PM Report Share Posted September 17, 2012 at 10:10 PM When the secretary's draft is up for approval, a tie vote on a proposed amendment to correct the record defeats the proposed amendment and the language in the draft stands.Therefore the motion, as worded in the draft, is the official record of what was adopted.Any member can propose to amend the adopted motion itself in most cases (RONR (11th ed.), p. 305ff), but good luck with that if the board is equally split.What does the maker of the motion say? After all he/she might be the best source of that the motion said. It may also have been written down somewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Wynn Posted September 17, 2012 at 10:24 PM Report Share Posted September 17, 2012 at 10:24 PM What does the maker of the motion say? After all he/she might be the best source of that the motion said. It may also have been written down somewhere.In the secretary's notes would have been a good place for the motion to have been written. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Mervosh Posted September 18, 2012 at 12:02 AM Report Share Posted September 18, 2012 at 12:02 AM g40, in my view this is the kind of discrepancy that can and must be avoided, and I don't mean to sound too harsh, but the fact the members don't know exactly what they voted on, or what effect their vote may have had, means the presiding officer failed miserably in his number one responsibility during a meeting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Novosielski Posted September 18, 2012 at 01:30 AM Report Share Posted September 18, 2012 at 01:30 AM What does the maker of the motion say? After all he/she might be the best source of that the motion said. It may also have been written down somewhere.If you're following the recommended method in RONR for approval of minutes, no formal motion is necessary.After the minutes have been read (or after their reading has been omitted by unanimous consent...), and whether or not a motion for approval has been offered, the chair asks, “Are there any corrections to the minutes?” and pauses. Corrections, when proposed, are usually handled by unanimous consent (pp. 54–56), but if any member objects to a proposed correction—which is, in effect, a subsidiary motion to Amend—the usual rules governing consideration of amendments to a main motion are applicable.So what you would do is:if you are one who disagrees with the draft minutes, propose a correctionif you are one who agrees with the draft minutes, wait for someone else to propose a correction and object to it when the chair asks if there is any objectionOnce objection is heard, the chair should treat the proposed correction as a motion to amend, which is debatable, so that would be the point where you could present your compelling evidence, one way or the other. If the amendment passes, the draft is corrected.After any proposed corrections have been disposed of, and when there is no response to the chair’s inquiry, “Are there any corrections [or “further corrections”] to the minutes?” the chair says, “There being no corrections [or “no further corrections”] to the minutes, the minutes stand [or “are”] approved [or “approved as read,” or “approved as corrected”].” The minutes are thus approved without any formal vote, even if a motion for their approval has been made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.