Jump to content
The Official RONR Q & A Forums

email votes


Guest Patty

Recommended Posts

Our organization is trying to conduct email votes to pass a motion, but not all members are responding to the vote.  It was suggested to inform the members if a vote is not cast by email within a certain time frame, the non-communication will be considered a vote to the majority of respondents.  Can a non-response be counted as a vote of the majority of respondents?  Hope this makes sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Important first thing:  Do your bylaws authorize using e-mail to vote?

 

If no, then all such votes are improper and invalid.

 

If yes, then your bylaws, or other rules, should spell out the details of how the vote is to be conducted.  In particular a person not voting  --  an abstention, or abstainer  --  cannot be counted as for or against a motion unless your rules have adopted that system (not a good one, by the way) ahead of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  Can a non-response be counted as a vote of the majority of respondents?  Hope this makes sense.

No, it cannot.  A non-response is not a vote.  It is an abstention.  It doesn't count for or against anything or anyone any more than if the member abstained in person or stayed home from the meeting without voting at all.

 

However, if the vote requirement is based on a percentage of the members present, or of the entire membership, rather than the customary  "members present and voting", an abstention can have the effect of  a no vote, but it is not a no vote and should not be counted as such.

 

Example:   You have 100 members and 35 vote yes and 25 vote no and 60 40 don't  vote at all.   The measure passes based on the usual majority vote, but fails  if the requirement is that it be carried by a majority of the entire  membership, such as might be required for a bylaw amendment.  Your bylaws should specify the vote threshold.

 

Lastly, as I see Dr. Stackpole just pointed out, you cannot have a mail vote or email vote unless your bylaws specifically authorize it or it is required by state law.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our organization is trying to conduct email votes to pass a motion, but not all members are responding to the vote.  It was suggested to inform the members if a vote is not cast by email within a certain time frame, the non-communication will be considered a vote to the majority of respondents.  Can a non-response be counted as a vote of the majority of respondents?  Hope this makes sense.

It makes sense, but it's completely against Robert's Rules.

 

Where do you imagine you could get the authority to do this?  Who is making up these rules as they go along?   Is e-mail voting even permitted in your bylaws in the first place?  If it is, then there should also be rules for how it's carried out.  There certainly are none in RONR.

 

Most particularly, there is nothing that would ever allow a non-response to be counted as a vote.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Mr Novosielski has mentioned, there is NO WAY a non-response could be considered a vote. It is an abstension which is NOT a vote. Now while it is possible to verbally respond that you abstain, that is a response and not a vote. I am going to post the email rules for one of my Organizations for the sake of a philosophical discussion in a new thread that will be somewhat related to this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Best case, and most typical case, a non-response is not counted, since it is--well--a non-response.

 

In some cases (less typical) a non-response, while not a vote, may have the effect of a No vote.  But it is not a No vote, since it is not a vote.

 

In no case is a non-vote ever counted as a Yes vote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

A 20 member organization tried to pass a new by-law change. We had 13 yes votes in favor and 6 no votes, and 1 abstain. It takes a two thirds majority to pass any by-law change . Most members decided the abstain vote did not count for or against the proposal. The math of the 19 votes yielded a two thirds majority and our idea that the proposal passed. The no voters said it was not a two thirds majority.  Any comments ?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Guest Les Bryan said:

A 20 member organization tried to pass a new by-law change. We had 13 yes votes in favor and 6 no votes, and 1 abstain. It takes a two thirds majority to pass any by-law change . Most members decided the abstain vote did not count for or against the proposal. The math of the 19 votes yielded a two thirds majority and our idea that the proposal passed. The no voters said it was not a two thirds majority.  Any comments ?

See FAQ #6.

In the future, please post a new question as a new topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Guest Les Bryan said:

A 20 member organization tried to pass a new by-law change. We had 13 yes votes in favor and 6 no votes, and 1 abstain. It takes a two thirds majority to pass any by-law change . Most members decided the abstain vote did not count for or against the proposal. The math of the 19 votes yielded a two thirds majority and our idea that the proposal passed. The no voters said it was not a two thirds majority.  Any comments ?

 

Yes, it was a 2/3 vote (not "2/3 majority" which is a contradiction).  In fact, even if two people had abstained, and it was 12-6, it would still pass.  Any time the Yes votes are at least twice as many as the No votes, a 2/3 vote has been achieved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...