Guest whattahw Posted May 2, 2021 at 09:41 AM Report Share Posted May 2, 2021 at 09:41 AM "The means of protecting all of these rights in appropriate measure forms much of the substance of parliamentary law, and the need for this protection dictates the degree of development that the subject has undergone." Can someone explain what is being defined when it states "development" and "subject"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Honemann Posted May 2, 2021 at 10:26 AM Report Share Posted May 2, 2021 at 10:26 AM 38 minutes ago, Guest whattahw said: "The means of protecting all of these rights in appropriate measure forms much of the substance of parliamentary law, and the need for this protection dictates the degree of development that the subject has undergone." Can someone explain what is being defined when it states "development" and "subject"? The "subject" is parliamentary law, and its "development" is described for you is some detail in the Introduction to RONR, 12th ed., pages xxix-xlviii. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. J. Posted May 2, 2021 at 01:23 PM Report Share Posted May 2, 2021 at 01:23 PM You might also see "Making Parliamentary Law," Parliamentary Journal, April, 2014. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Honemann Posted May 2, 2021 at 01:44 PM Report Share Posted May 2, 2021 at 01:44 PM 20 minutes ago, J. J. said: You might also see "Making Parliamentary Law," Parliamentary Journal, April, 2014. And how does one go about doing that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Brown Posted May 2, 2021 at 01:58 PM Report Share Posted May 2, 2021 at 01:58 PM 11 minutes ago, Daniel H. Honemann said: And how does one go about doing that? Thank you for asking! I was just wondering the same thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. J. Posted May 2, 2021 at 02:27 PM Report Share Posted May 2, 2021 at 02:27 PM 39 minutes ago, Daniel H. Honemann said: And how does one go about doing that? You might contact the American Institute of Parliamentarians. https://aipparl.org/ I'm sure you could contact the author, who might have a copy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Honemann Posted May 2, 2021 at 02:52 PM Report Share Posted May 2, 2021 at 02:52 PM 14 minutes ago, J. J. said: You might contact the American Institute of Parliamentarians. https://aipparl.org/ I'm sure you could contact the author, who might have a copy. Well, perhaps Guest whattahw will find this information concerning how to obtain a copy helpful. But if not, a review of what is said in RONR's Introduction should suffice. 🙂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. J. Posted May 2, 2021 at 03:54 PM Report Share Posted May 2, 2021 at 03:54 PM 50 minutes ago, Daniel H. Honemann said: Well, perhaps Guest whattahw will find this information concerning how to obtain a copy helpful. But if not, a review of what is said in RONR's Introduction should suffice. 🙂 Well, it is a bit broader, but does discuss, and show some examples of, the "meeting made law." William Evans seminal "Is Parliamentary Law 'Law'" is cited and discussed, along with an opinion he coauthored on the AIP Opinions Committee. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Brown Posted May 2, 2021 at 04:31 PM Report Share Posted May 2, 2021 at 04:31 PM 2 hours ago, J. J. said: I'm sure you could contact the author, who might have a copy And who would that be and how might he or she be contacted? Is the article available online? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Honemann Posted May 2, 2021 at 04:45 PM Report Share Posted May 2, 2021 at 04:45 PM 49 minutes ago, J. J. said: Well, it is a bit broader, but does discuss, and show some examples of, the "meeting made law." William Evans seminal "Is Parliamentary Law 'Law'" is cited and discussed, along with an opinion he coauthored on the AIP Opinions Committee. Perhaps, but it still is not of much help to Guest whattahw, who asked the question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. J. Posted May 2, 2021 at 05:44 PM Report Share Posted May 2, 2021 at 05:44 PM 1 hour ago, Richard Brown said: And who would that be and how might he or she be contacted? Is the article available online? The Evan's article can be gotten from NAP. I can send you a copy of the other one, if you wish. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest whattahw Posted May 3, 2021 at 12:31 AM Report Share Posted May 3, 2021 at 12:31 AM 7 hours ago, Daniel H. Honemann said: Perhaps, but it still is not of much help to Guest whattahw, who asked the question. Daniel is great moderator. Thanks to everyone for the information. I have no further questions, I yield the floor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob Elsman Posted May 3, 2021 at 01:38 AM Report Share Posted May 3, 2021 at 01:38 AM 1 hour ago, Guest whattahw said: ...I yield the floor. Oh, dear. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Brown Posted May 3, 2021 at 01:44 AM Report Share Posted May 3, 2021 at 01:44 AM 9 hours ago, J. J. said: Well, it is a bit broader, but does discuss, and show some examples of, the "meeting made law." William Evans seminal "Is Parliamentary Law 'Law'" is cited and discussed, along with an opinion he coauthored on the AIP Opinions Committee. Do you have a cite or date for the article by William Evans? I've got a lot of old "National Parliamenterians" from NAP in spiral bound form. I have the July and October 2014 issues of the "Parliamentary Journal", but not the April 2014 issue. 7 hours ago, J. J. said: The Evan's article can be gotten from NAP. I can send you a copy of the other one, if you wish. Please do! You have my email address. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts