Jump to content
The Official RONR Q & A Forums

Proposal worded incorrectly in minutes


Tammie

Recommended Posts

Our secretary worded a member's proposal incorrectly in the minutes. The member asked for payment for roadwork but the secretary worded it as if he had asked for credit to his dues. The 4 of 7 members present at the following meeting, when voting occurs, realized the mistake and acknowledged that the wording was incorrect and voted to approve the proposal as it was originally intended. The treasurer issued a check to the member. How does the secretary correct his mistake? (The other 3 of 7 members did not attend either meeting. 1 submitted an absentee vote in favor of the proposal as it was worded in the minutes. The other 2 members did not submit votes.)

Thanks for your help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our secretary worded a member's proposal incorrectly in the minutes. The member asked for payment for roadwork but the secretary worded it as if he had asked for credit to his dues.

Was this motion (the proposal) one that required prior notice? I'm just wondering why the proposal was presented at one meeting, while the vote took place at the following meeting.

The 4 of 7 members present at the following meeting, when voting occurs, realized the mistake and acknowledged that the wording was incorrect and voted to approve the proposal as it was originally intended. The treasurer issued a check to the member. How does the secretary correct his mistake? (The other 3 of 7 members did not attend either meeting. 1 submitted an absentee vote in favor of the proposal as it was worded in the minutes. The other 2 members did not submit votes.)

Thanks for your help.

I guess I'm a bit puzzled by this sequence of events -- how did the absent members see the proposal 'as it was worded in the minutes'?

In other words, the proposal is made at meeting 1. The secretary prepares draft minutes (which cannot be approved until meeting 2). Members who were absent for meeting 1 (therefore they did not hear the proposal in person) base their voting decisions on information contained in the draft (not yet approved) minutes. How did that come about? Is that part of normal operation in this organization, and, if so, are the draft minutes being used to provide notice?

Further, at meeting 2, the members present apparently agreed that the draft minutes were wrong, so why didn't they just go ahead and correct them on the spot before approving them at meeting 2?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...