Jump to content
The Official RONR Q & A Forums

No vote of confidence


Lori Sweet

Recommended Posts

The motion require a majority vote to approve as it would be a main motion.  However, unless the By-laws state otherwise, the motion has no power - other then to indicate that the body has no confidence in a particulate group or individual, it does not cause anyone to be removed from office (unlike legislatures operating under the Westminster System where a motion of no confidence would lead to an election or the opposition forming the a new government.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But this is a way to let leadership know that their actions.etc are not supported by the voting delegates - correct?  Is there a better way to do this without removal?  Removal of officers is such a nasty process and things are already very contentious.

 

Either elect someone new when their terms expire or remove them.  A vote of no confidence or censure are both meaningless unless the By-laws require action (such as forcing them to resign.)  Either no confidence or censure will let the Board know of the general membership's displeasure but that is about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd note that a no-confidence motion is often just that,  a motion that the body has no-confidence in Elmer Fudd.

 

A censure resolution (it's worthy of a little dressing up) typically states the precise acts (in Whereas clauses) for which the censure is imposed.  If you're trying to send a message, that's likely to be the clearer message.

 

There's no reason the two couldn't be effectively reversed, it's just been my experience that censure resolutions are a clearer message.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...