Lori Sweet Posted June 23, 2014 at 10:52 PM Report Share Posted June 23, 2014 at 10:52 PM I understand that RONR does not give support/advice for a "no vote of confidence", but that if it comes up it's a "main motion". Is this motion amendable? If it comes to the floor at convention, is it a majority vote or a 2/3 vote? Some help and guidance on this is most appreciated! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edgar Guest Posted June 23, 2014 at 11:10 PM Report Share Posted June 23, 2014 at 11:10 PM RONR notes (p.137) that a motion to commend someone can be amended into a motion to censure that person. So I'd say your "no confidence" motion is an ordinary main motion: amendable, debatable, and requiring only a majority vote for adoption. See FAQ #7. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rev Ed Posted June 24, 2014 at 12:09 AM Report Share Posted June 24, 2014 at 12:09 AM The motion require a majority vote to approve as it would be a main motion. However, unless the By-laws state otherwise, the motion has no power - other then to indicate that the body has no confidence in a particulate group or individual, it does not cause anyone to be removed from office (unlike legislatures operating under the Westminster System where a motion of no confidence would lead to an election or the opposition forming the a new government.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lori Sweet Posted June 24, 2014 at 12:22 AM Author Report Share Posted June 24, 2014 at 12:22 AM But this is a way to let leadership know that their actions.etc are not supported by the voting delegates - correct? Is there a better way to do this without removal? Removal of officers is such a nasty process and things are already very contentious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edgar Guest Posted June 24, 2014 at 12:24 AM Report Share Posted June 24, 2014 at 12:24 AM Is there a better way to do this without removal?Wait until their terms are up and elect someone else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lori Sweet Posted June 24, 2014 at 12:37 AM Author Report Share Posted June 24, 2014 at 12:37 AM Indeed, but so very difficult especially with 2 year terms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jstackpo Posted June 24, 2014 at 12:43 AM Report Share Posted June 24, 2014 at 12:43 AM Move to Censure them - that motion is clearly in RONR Lots of references on p. 677. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lori Sweet Posted June 24, 2014 at 01:01 AM Author Report Share Posted June 24, 2014 at 01:01 AM Ok. Will take a look at that now. Thank you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rev Ed Posted June 24, 2014 at 02:21 AM Report Share Posted June 24, 2014 at 02:21 AM But this is a way to let leadership know that their actions.etc are not supported by the voting delegates - correct? Is there a better way to do this without removal? Removal of officers is such a nasty process and things are already very contentious. Either elect someone new when their terms expire or remove them. A vote of no confidence or censure are both meaningless unless the By-laws require action (such as forcing them to resign.) Either no confidence or censure will let the Board know of the general membership's displeasure but that is about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Novosielski Posted June 24, 2014 at 03:53 AM Report Share Posted June 24, 2014 at 03:53 AM I'd note that a no-confidence motion is often just that, a motion that the body has no-confidence in Elmer Fudd. A censure resolution (it's worthy of a little dressing up) typically states the precise acts (in Whereas clauses) for which the censure is imposed. If you're trying to send a message, that's likely to be the clearer message. There's no reason the two couldn't be effectively reversed, it's just been my experience that censure resolutions are a clearer message. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lori Sweet Posted June 27, 2014 at 12:01 AM Author Report Share Posted June 27, 2014 at 12:01 AM Thank you gentlemen. Will seriously consider censure. I believe we would have the delegate support to do this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.