Jump to content
The Official RONR Q & A Forums

Confusing the Parliamentarian


Timothy

Recommended Posts

Still, it's an intriguing, challenging question.  Thank you, Mr Fish.  In my own case (as an aspiring parliamentarian, albeit) I certainly don't need any help achieving this state from the chair, or anyone else.

 

But it's an envelope-stretcher.  Thank you again, Mr Fish.  And forewarned is forearmed.

 

[Edited to insert italicized phrase, as, without it, the reverse meaning could be inferred]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Though I was not serving as parliamentarian, I had a confusing moment a few weeks ago, or at least a frustrating moment. We had received information that circumstances prevented a motion adopted in a previous meeting from being carried out. The chair turned to me and asked how it should be handled. Another gentleman, who is somewhat knowledgeable of Robert's Rules of Order, spoke up and said, "What we need is a substitute motion." (This without there being a main motion.) He then proceeded to say, "I move that we substitute, the substitution of the substitute, to substitute the substitution."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...