Jump to content
The Official RONR Q & A Forums

Bylaw interpretation


Guest Joan

Recommended Posts

Yes, the general membership has that authority, specifically, "Each society decides for itself the meaning of its bylaws (p. 588, l.25)."  Note that, if the meaning is clear, it cannot be changed by interpretation.

The only exception would be if the bylaws, or some rule adopted by the assembly, grants the board the authority to interpret the bylaws. 

Edited by J. J.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Guest Joan said:

Thank you.

I take this to mean that if there are conflicts in the bylaws, it is up to the general membership to interpret that, not the board.
 

You bet.  And if your bylaws are fairly typical, it's the general membership who adopts bylaws in the first place, and who is authorized to amend them (for example, to fix those conflicting provisions).  Boards are not superior bodies, they are subordinate to the general membership, and have only such powers as are granted to them by the membership in the bylaws.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you, everyone.

 

On 4/27/2019 at 9:17 AM, Gary Novosielski said:

You bet.  And if your bylaws are fairly typical, it's the general membership who adopts bylaws in the first place, and who is authorized to amend them (for example, to fix those conflicting provisions).  Boards are not superior bodies, they are subordinate to the general membership, and have only such powers as are granted to them by the membership in the bylaws.

Is there by chance some specific statement in Robert's Rules to the effect that boards are not superior bodies but are in fact subordinate to the general membership?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Guest Joan said:

Is there by chance some specific statement in Robert's Rules to the effect that boards are not superior bodies but are in fact subordinate to the general membership?

“In any event, no action of the board can alter or conflict with any decision made by the assembly of the society, and any such action of the board is null and void (see p. 577, ll. 23–33). Except in matters placed by the bylaws exclusively under the control of the board, the society's assembly can give the board instructions which it must carry out, and can rescind or amend any action of the board if it is not too late (see 35).” (RONR, 11th ed., pg. 483)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Josh Martin said:

“In any event, no action of the board can alter or conflict with any decision made by the assembly of the society, and any such action of the board is null and void (see p. 577, ll. 23–33). Except in matters placed by the bylaws exclusively under the control of the board, the society's assembly can give the board instructions which it must carry out, and can rescind or amend any action of the board if it is not too late (see 35).” (RONR, 11th ed., pg. 483)

Thank you.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/27/2019 at 2:16 AM, Guest Joan said:

Hello.
 

Is there anywhere in Robert's Rules that indicates who gets to interpret an organization's bylaws? Is it the board or is it the general membership?

 

Thank you.

 

On 4/27/2019 at 2:26 AM, J. J. said:

Yes, the general membership has that authority, specifically, "Each society decides for itself the meaning of its bylaws (p. 588, l.25)."  Note that, if the meaning is clear, it cannot be changed by interpretation.

The only exception would be if the bylaws, or some rule adopted by the assembly, grants the board the authority to interpret the bylaws. 

It's not one or the other. The board may need to interpret the bylaws just as much as the assembly of members may need to. I agree that if the board disagrees with the assembly, the assembly's interpretation prevails.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Shmuel Gerber said:

 

It's not one or the other. The board may need to interpret the bylaws just as much as the assembly of members may need to. I agree that if the board disagrees with the assembly, the assembly's interpretation prevails.

I'm looking at who has the ultimate authority to interpret. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...