Guest Steve Posted February 18, 2020 at 01:44 PM Report Share Posted February 18, 2020 at 01:44 PM I am on a committee of 10 that oversees a religious non profit. A member was reporting on a hiring recommendation and after presenting, said that myself and another board member needed to abstain because of conflicts of interest. (The applicant is a relative of mine through marriage). Now, I had every intention of doing this from the beginning, but my question is: was it appropriate for that member to state openly in the meeting that I NEEDED to do this? I’ve never seen this approach taken, and was mildly offended. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob Elsman Posted February 18, 2020 at 02:08 PM Report Share Posted February 18, 2020 at 02:08 PM RONR does not have rules prohibiting, or even advising, that a member of a committee should abstain on account of a perceived "conflict of interest" by way of a relationship of affinity. Unless your religious organization has its own rules to the contrary, I would encourage you to vote your best judgment right along with the other members. I, too, am mildly offended that your colleague had the audacity to suggest in a meeting that someone else should abstain. That had to have been embarrassing. You may tell that person for me to stick to his own knitting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Mervosh Posted February 18, 2020 at 02:18 PM Report Share Posted February 18, 2020 at 02:18 PM I personally wouldn't be offended by it but I agree with Mr. Elsman that the comment was not proper. It seems to go toward the member's (your) motives. You should also note you were not compelled to abstain. See https://www.robertsrules.com/faq.html#9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Harrison Posted February 18, 2020 at 06:10 PM Report Share Posted February 18, 2020 at 06:10 PM 3 hours ago, Rob Elsman said: RONR does not have rules prohibiting, or even advising, that a member of a committee should abstain on account of a perceived "conflict of interest" by way of a relationship of affinity. Though depending on the relationship between the Guest Steve and applicant it might constitute a personal interest not in common with the other Committee members. In that case Guest Steve probably shouldn't vote but as was mentioned above he can't be compelled to abstain and the decision whether this uncommon personal interest exists belongs to him not the other member. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Steve Posted February 18, 2020 at 09:41 PM Report Share Posted February 18, 2020 at 09:41 PM Thank you! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Novosielski Posted February 19, 2020 at 01:48 PM Report Share Posted February 19, 2020 at 01:48 PM On 2/18/2020 at 8:44 AM, Guest Steve said: I am on a committee of 10 that oversees a religious non profit. A member was reporting on a hiring recommendation and after presenting, said that myself and another board member needed to abstain because of conflicts of interest. (The applicant is a relative of mine through marriage). Now, I had every intention of doing this from the beginning, but my question is: was it appropriate for that member to state openly in the meeting that I NEEDED to do this? I’ve never seen this approach taken, and was mildly offended. As well you should be. It's bad enough to be presumptuous, but it's particularly irksome to be wrong as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts